首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Marketing >Who Receives Credit or Blame? The Effects of Made-to-Order Production on Responses to Unethical and Ethical Company Production Practices
【24h】

Who Receives Credit or Blame? The Effects of Made-to-Order Production on Responses to Unethical and Ethical Company Production Practices

机译:谁获得信用或责备?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While prior research has found that consumer-influenced production improves purchase intentions, the author proposes that it can counterintuitively backfire. This work demonstrates that when consumers have some control over production (e.g., ordering products on demand, customization, preordering), they have lower purchase intentions for products made with unethical processes (e.g., pollution, underpaid labor) than if they had no role in production (i.e., buying what is already in inventory). This effect reverses, however, with positive ethical production (e.g., recycled materials). Because consumers have direct responsibility for whether a product is made, feelings of anticipated guilt or gratification result depending on the ethicality of the production process. This work also proposes a novel threefold conceptualization of responsibility that can be used as managerial levers: direct responsibility, diffusion of responsibility, and broad responsibility. Field studies using Facebook's advertising platform demonstrate positioning strategies for fair-trade brands and advocacy groups.
机译:尽管先前的研究已经发现,受消费者影响的生产可以改善购买意愿,但作者提出,它可以反直觉适得其反。这项工作表明,当消费者对生产有一定的控制权(例如按需订购产品,定制,预订购)时,与没有道德行为的产品相比,他们对具有不道德流程(例如污染,劳动报酬不足)的产品的购买意愿较低。生产(即购买库存中已有的东西)。但是,这种影响在积极的道德生产(例如回收材料)中会逆转。因为消费者对是否生产产品负有直接责任,所以根据生产过程的道德标准,会产生预期的罪恶感或满足感。这项工作还提出了一种新颖的三重责任概念,可以用作管理杠杆:直接责任,责任分散和广泛责任。使用Facebook广告平台进行的实地研究证明了公平贸易品牌和倡导团体的定位策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号