...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of marketing communications >For one or many? Tie strength and the impact of broadcasted vs. narrowcasted advice
【24h】

For one or many? Tie strength and the impact of broadcasted vs. narrowcasted advice

机译:一个或多个?领带强度以及广播和窄播建议的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Consumers' and marketers' growing reliance on digital and social media has significantly influenced the nature of communications. Importantly, new communication mediums have made it easier for communicators to provide recommendations to a single individual (i.e., a one-to-one communication known as narrowcasting) as well as to large numbers of individuals (i.e., a one-to-many communication known as broadcasting). The current research assesses the impact of advice scope (either narrowcasted or broadcasted advice) on consumers' likelihood of taking advice. Across two experiments, we demonstrate that the acceptance of broadcasted or narrowcasted advice is dependent upon tie strength between the advisor and the advisee. Furthermore, we highlight the role of psychological reactance in consumers' response to narrowcasted and broadcasted advice. Our results extend prior research on consumer advice utilization and identify situations where broadcasted advice may be more persuasive than narrowcasted advice.
机译:消费者和市场营销人员对数字和社交媒体的依赖性日益增强,这极大地影响了通信的性质。重要的是,新的通信媒介使通信者更容易向单个个人(即称为窄播的一对一通信)以及大量个体(即一对多通信)提供建议。称为广播)。当前的研究评估了建议范围(窄播或广播建议)对消费者接受建议的可能性的影响。在两个实验中,我们证明了接受广播或窄播建议取决于顾问与被建议者之间的联系强度。此外,我们强调了心理反应在消费者对窄播和播出建议的反应中的作用。我们的结果扩展了有关消费者建议使用的先前研究,并确定了广播建议可能比窄播建议更具说服力的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号