首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management >Rethinking 'Contribution'
【24h】

Rethinking 'Contribution'

机译:重新思考“贡献”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As I have begun my term as the Editor of Journal of Management, I have been forced to think about what the phrase contribution to theory really means. I once had a colleague denied tenure because some thought the six "A" publications did not represent a sufficient contribution. I've had a number of papers rejected over the years because reviewers felt there was not enough of a contribution. I cannot begin to describe how many times in my Associate Editor role I read comments by reviewers questioning the contribution of a particular study. Thus, now I have to provide guidance to 12 great Associate Editors and two accomplished Senior Associate Editors regarding what contribution should mean at JOM for the next 3 years.
机译:当我开始担任《管理学报》的编辑时,我被迫考虑对理论的贡献到底意味着什么。我曾经有一位同事拒绝任职,因为有人认为六份“ A”出版物不能代表足够的贡献。这些年来,我有很多论文被拒绝,因为审稿人觉得贡献不足。我无法开始描述在我的副编辑角色中,我读过审阅者对特定研究的贡献提出质疑的评论的次数。因此,现在我必须为12名杰出的副编辑和两名出色的高级副编辑提供指导,说明未来3年对JOM的意义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Management》 |2015年第3期|765-768|共4页
  • 作者

    Patrick M. Wright;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:24:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号