首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management Inquiry >Conflict, Incommensurability, and Theory Groups: A Longitudinal Investigation of Citations in the Organization-Environment Literature
【24h】

Conflict, Incommensurability, and Theory Groups: A Longitudinal Investigation of Citations in the Organization-Environment Literature

机译:冲突,不可通约性和理论组:组织-环境文学中对引文的纵向调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Much is already known about how theory groups—schools of thought centered on the influential works of a small number of scholars—emerge. Yet, little is known about how prolonged periods of conflict between theory groups affects the theory-group life cycle. The author presents a review of critiques and exchanges published by scholars in the organization-environment subfield, and shows that these can be used to identify "emergence," "conflict," and "postconflict" periods. Poisson and negative binomial regression analyses of 656 publications show that the frequency of intertheory-group citations decreased following the conflict period (1985-1994). Linear regression models show that, when intertheory-group citations appeared following the conflict period, they were increasingly likely to be of older rather than newer publications. The results suggest that periods of heightened conflict, because of their effect on intertheory-group citations, may impact future theory development.
机译:关于理论团体(思想流派以少数学者的有影响力的著作为中心)是如何出现的,已经为人们所知。但是,关于理论组之间的长时间冲突如何影响理论组生命周期的知之甚少。作者介绍了学者在组织-环境子领域中发表的批评和交流,并指出这些评论和交流可用于识别“出现”,“冲突”和“冲突后”时期。对656个出版物的Poisson和负二项式回归分析表明,在冲突时期(1985-1994年)之后,理论组间的引用频率降低。线性回归模型表明,在冲突时期之后出现理论间组引用时,它们越来越有可能是较旧的出版物,而不是较新的出版物。结果表明,由于冲突加剧对理论组间的引用而产生的影响,可能会影响未来的理论发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号