首页> 外文期刊>Journal of management education >Inclusive Leadership Development: Drawing From Pedagogies of Women's and General Leadership Development Programs
【24h】

Inclusive Leadership Development: Drawing From Pedagogies of Women's and General Leadership Development Programs

机译:包容性领导力发展:借鉴妇女和一般领导力发展计划的教学法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Trends in extant literature suggest that more relational and identity-based leadership approaches are necessary for leadership that can harness the benefits of the diverse and globalized workforces of today and the future. In this study, we compared general leadership development programs (GLDPs) and women's leadership development programs (WLDPs) to understand to what extent program descriptions addressed inclusive leadership-leadership that draws on relational skills to value both the uniqueness and belonging needs of diverse identities to create business effectiveness for the long term. GLDPs predominantly reflected pedagogical assumptions of separate knowing, development of the autonomous self, and masculine leadership approaches of agentic and transactional leadership. In contrast, pedagogical assumptions of connected knowing, development of the relational self, and relational and identity-based leadership approaches were more prevalent in WLDPs. These findings suggest that WLDPs continue to offer significant value to supporting women leaders in their advancement, yet both WLDPs and GLDPs can do more to be inclusive of additional diverse identities to better develop leaders of the future who can lead with inclusive behaviors. We suggest a pedagogical framework for inclusive leadership development that may better balance and promote synergies between achieving business priorities and relating to others and their diverse identities.
机译:现有文献的趋势表明,对于能够利用当今和未来多样化和全球化的劳动力所带来的好处的领导,必须采用更多的基于关系和基于身份的领导方法。在这项研究中,我们比较了一般领导力发展计划(GLDPs)和妇女领导力发展计划(WLDPs),以了解计划描述在多大程度上解决了包容性领导-领导力问题,该能力依靠关系技能来重视不同身份的独特性和归属感,长期创造业务效益。 GLDP主要反映了关于独立认识,自主自我发展以及代理和交易型领导的男性领导方式的教学假设。相反,在WLDP中,关于联系的知识,关系自我的发展以及基于关系和基于身份的领导方法的教学假设更为普遍。这些发现表明,WLDP继续为支持女性领导者的晋升提供巨大价值,但是WLDP和GLDP都可以做更多的工作,以囊括更多多样的身份,从而更好地培养可以领导包容性行为的未来领导者。我们建议建立一个包容性领导力发展的教学框架,以更好地平衡和促进实现业务优先事项以及与他人和他们的不同身份之间的协同作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号