首页> 外文期刊>Journal of management control >Configuring a profile-deviation-analysis to statistical test complementarity effects from balanced management control systems in a configurational fit approach
【24h】

Configuring a profile-deviation-analysis to statistical test complementarity effects from balanced management control systems in a configurational fit approach

机译:以配置适合的方式配置概要文件偏差分析以统计来自平衡管理控制系统的统计测试互补效应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper develops novel test formulas able to test performance effects from balancing control forms in management control systems using the notion of complementarity. Extant research has underlined the importance of researching and understanding complementarity effects stemming from multiple control forms—i.e., management control systems. In configurations of management controls, a number of control forms work interdependently. In some cases, these interdependencies produce complementarity effects, which previous literature has not captured in full, as synergy effects from interdependencies in configurations are often treated implicitly or tested too reductionistic. Previously used statistical test techniques and formulas have not been fully developed to test performance effects using a configurational fit approach that accounts for complementarity effects from balancing multiple control forms and roles of management accountants (finance functions). In configurations of management control systems, control forms and/or roles of management accountants can be balanced to fit local optima for each control form, and simultaneously fitting the distance, i.e. balance, to other control forms/roles, in which the latter can produce complementarity effects. This balance type of complementarity is a subset of the broader notion of complementarity. To move research forward, new formulas are developed that is suited to testing complementarity effects from balancing management control forms. In this way, the black box of how configurations of control forms produce performance is being opened, yet not completely, to better examine how they collectively produce performance. The developed test formulas are illustrated using survey-data on whether multiple roles of management accountants can affect performance in a complementing manner given the strategy of the company they serve.
机译:本文开发了新颖的测试公式,该公式可以使用互补性概念从管理控制系统中的平衡控制形式测试性能效果。现有的研究强调了研究和理解源于多种控制形式(即管理控制系统)的互补效应的重要性。在管理控件的配置中,许多控件形式是相互依赖的。在某些情况下,这些相互依赖性会产生互补性效应,而以前的文献并未充分介绍这种互补性,因为通常会隐式地对待来自构型相互依赖性的协同效应,或者对其进行过简化的测试。尚未完全开发出以前使用的统计测试技术和公式来使用配置拟合方法来测试绩效效果,该方法考虑了平衡多种控制形式和管理会计角色(财务职能)产生的互补效应。在管理控制系统的配置中,可以平衡控制形式和/或管理会计的角色,以适合每个控制形式的局部最优,并同时使距离(即平衡)适合于其他控制形式/角色,后者可以在其中生成互补效应。这种平衡类型的互补性是更广泛的互补性概念的子集。为了推动研究的发展,开发了适用于测试平衡管理控制形式的互补效应的新公式。通过这种方式,控制形式的配置如何产生性能的黑匣子被打开了,但还没有完全打开,以更好地检查它们如何共同产生性能。使用调查数据说明了开发的测试公式,这些数据说明了管理会计师的多种角色是否可以根据他们所服务的公司的战略以互补的方式影响绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号