Hi'/> Comparison between collective coordinate models for domain wall motion in PMA nanostrips in the presence of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials >Comparison between collective coordinate models for domain wall motion in PMA nanostrips in the presence of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction
【24h】

Comparison between collective coordinate models for domain wall motion in PMA nanostrips in the presence of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction

机译:在存在Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya相互作用的情况下,PMA纳米带中畴壁运动的集体坐标模型之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

HighlightsA Lagrangian-based four collective coordinate DW model is presented.Improved semi-analytical approach properly treats the effects of DW asymmetry.Semi-analytical approach enables accuracy assessment Lagrangian-based models.Semi-analytical approach is used to gain understanding of limitations of models.DW asymmetry contributes to discrepancy between models and field-driven simulations.AbstractLagrangian-based collective coordinate models for magnetic domain wall (DW) motion rely on an ansatz for the DW profile and a Lagrangian approach to describe the DW motion in terms of a set of time-dependent collective coordinates: the DW position, the DW magnetization angle, the DW width and the DW tilting angle. Another approach was recently used to derive similar equations of motion by averaging the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation without any ansatz, and identifying the relevant collective coordinates afterwards. In this paper, we use an updated version of the semi-analytical equations to compare the Lagrangian-based collective coordinate models with micromagnetic simulations for field- and STT-driven (spin-transfer torque-driven) DW motion in Pt/CoFe/MgO and Pt/Co/AlOxnanostrips. Through this comparison, we assess the accuracy of the different models, and provide insight into the deviations of the models from simulations. It is found that the lack of terms related to DW asymmetry in the Lagrangian-based collective coordinate models significantly contributes to the discrepancy between the predictions of the most accurate Lagrangian-based model and the micromagnetic simulations in the field-driven case. This is in contrast to the STT-driven case where the DW remains symmetric.
机译: 突出显示 提出了基于拉格朗日的四个集体坐标DW模型。 < ce:list-item id =“ u0010”> 改进的半分析方法可以正确处理DW不对称性的影响。 半分析方法可实现基于拉格朗日模型的准确性评估。 使用半分析方法来了解限制ns模型。 DW不对称加剧了模型与现场驱动的仿真之间的差异。 摘要 基于拉格朗日的磁畴壁(DW)运动的集体坐标模型依赖DW轮廓的ansatz和拉格朗日方法以一组随时间变化的集体坐标来描述DW运动:DW位置,DW磁化角,DW宽度和DW倾斜角。最近,另一种方法是通过对没有任何ansatz的Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert方程求平均,然后确定相关的集体坐标来导出相似的运动方程。在本文中,我们使用了半解析方程的更新版本,将基于拉格朗日的集体坐标模型与用于Pt / CoFe / MgO的场和STT驱动(自旋传递扭矩驱动)DW运动的微磁仿真进行比较。和Pt / Co / AlO x 纳米条纹。通过此比较,我们评估了不同模型的准确性,并提供了对模型与仿真偏差的了解。发现在基于拉格朗日的集体坐标模型中缺少与DW不对称相关的术语,这极大地加剧了最精确的基于拉格朗日模型的预测与场驱动情况下的微磁模拟之间的差异。这与DW保持对称的STT驱动情况相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号