...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of logic, language and information >Expressive Power of 'Now' and 'Then' Operators
【24h】

Expressive Power of 'Now' and 'Then' Operators

机译:“现在”和“然后”运算符的表达能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Natural language provides motivation for studying modal backwards-looking operators such as "now", "then" and "actually" that evaluate their argument formula at some previously considered point instead of the current one. This paper investigates the expressive power over models of both propositional and first-order basic modal language enriched with such operators. Having defined an appropriate notion of bisimulation for first-order modal logic, I show that backwards-looking operators increase its expressive power quite mildly, contrary to beliefs widespread among philosophers of language and formal semanticists. That in turn presents a strong argument for the use of operator-based systems in the semantics of natural language, instead of systems with explicit quantification over worlds and times that have become a de-facto standard for such applications. The popularity of such explicit-quantification systems is shown to be based on the misinterpretation of a claim by Cresswell (Entities and indices, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990), which led many philosophers and linguists to assume (wrongly) that introducing "now" and "then" is expressively equivalent to explicitly quantifying over worlds and times.
机译:自然语言为研究模态后向运算符(例如“ now”,“ then”和“ actually”)提供了动力,这些运算符在先前考虑的某个点而不是当前点评估其自变量公式。本文研究了命题和一阶基本模态语言模型的表达能力,这些模型丰富了这些算子。在为一阶模态逻辑定义了适当的双仿真概念后,我表明,与语言哲学家和形式语义学家普遍认为的相反,向后看的运算符会适度地提高其表达能力。反过来,这为在自然语言的语义中使用基于运算符的系统提出了有力的论据,而不是在世界和时间上已明确量化的系统已成为此类应用的实际标准。事实证明,这种显式量化系统的普及是基于对Cresswell的主张的误解(实体和索引,Kluwer,Dordrecht,1990年),这导致许多哲学家和语言学家错误地假设引入了“现在”和“现在”。 “那么”在表达上等效于明确量化世界和时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号