首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Lightwave Technology >Implementations of smart pixels for optoelectronic processors and interconnection systems. II. SEED-based technology and comparison with optoelectronic gates
【24h】

Implementations of smart pixels for optoelectronic processors and interconnection systems. II. SEED-based technology and comparison with optoelectronic gates

机译:用于光电处理器和互连系统的智能像素的实现。二。基于SEED的技术以及与光电门的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

For part I see ibid., vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1659-1669 (Oct. 1993). In part I, the authors discussed the optoelectronic approach to the implementation of smart pixels for optical interconnection and optical computing systems. In this second paper, a similar analysis is done for SEED-based technologies. The technologies investigated include the symmetric SEED (S-SEED), asymmetric Fabry-Perot (ASFP) SEED, shallow quantum well SEED, and FET-SEED. Of these technologies, it is found that FET-SEED (whose structure is closely similar to optoelectronic logic gates) has the highest sensitivity and operates at the highest bandwidth. The advantages and limitations of the two approaches are compared, considering such system performance issues as the maximum information flux density, temperature sensitivity, and optical coupling efficiency. It is concluded that the optoelectronic approach is useful in applications which require high bandwidth (<1 GHz), complex logic functions, and moderate pixel density, while the SEED-based approach is more suitable to high-density interconnections used at moderate bandwidths (>100 MHz). Furthermore, the maximum information flux density of 2-D optoelectronic and FET-SEED logic gates is approximately 200 GHz/cm/sup 2/, which is from 1 to 2 orders of magnitude larger than for other SEED-based array technologies.
机译:关于这一部分,我看同上。 11号,第10卷,第1659-1669页(1993年10月)。在第一部分中,作者讨论了用于实现光学互连和光学计算系统的智能像素的光电方法。在第二篇论文中,对基于SEED的技术进行了类似的分析。研究的技术包括对称SEED(S-SEED),不对称Fabry-Perot(ASFP)SEED,浅量子阱SEED和FET-SEED。在这些技术中,发现FET-SEED(其结构与光电逻辑门非常相似)具有最高的灵敏度并在最高带宽下工作。考虑到诸如最大信息通量密度,温度灵敏度和光耦合效率之类的系统性能问题,比较了这两种方法的优点和局限性。结论是,光电方法在需要高带宽(<1 GHz),复杂逻辑功能和中等像素密度的应用中很有用,而基于SEED的方法更适合在中等带宽(上使用的高密度互连100 MHz)。此外,二维光电和FET-SEED逻辑门的最大信息通量密度约为200 GHz / cm / sup 2 /,比其他基于SEED的阵列技术大1至2个数量级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号