首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Legal Studies >Case Law versus Statute Law: An Evolutionary Comparison
【24h】

Case Law versus Statute Law: An Evolutionary Comparison

机译:判例法与成文法:进化的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Case law develops gradually through the rulings of appellate judges who have heterogeneous preferences but are partially bound by stare decisis. We show that its evolution converges toward more efficient and predictable legal rules. Since statutes do not share this evolutionary property, case law is the best system when the efficient rule is time invariant, even if the legislature is more democratically representative than individual judges are. In the presence of social change, the ideal legal system includes both legislation and judicial decisions as complementary sources of law. Our model thus explains the modern history of common law and the observed cross-country correlation between legal origins and economic outcomes. It also predicts the gradual convergence of civil law and common law toward a mixed system.
机译:判例法通过具有不同偏好但部分受凝视决定约束的上诉法官的裁决而逐步发展。我们表明,它的演变趋向于更有效和可预测的法律规则。由于法规不具有这种演进性,因此即使有效立法机构比个别法官更具民主代表性,判例法也是有效规则不受时间限制的最佳制度。在存在社会变革的情况下,理想的法律体系既包括立法又包括司法判决,作为法律的补充来源。因此,我们的模型解释了普通法的现代历史以及法律渊源与经济成果之间的跨国相关性。它还预测了民法和普通法向混合制度的逐渐融合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号