...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction >Concurrent Delays in Construction: International Legal Perspective
【24h】

Concurrent Delays in Construction: International Legal Perspective

机译:并发施工延误:国际法律视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The term "concurrent delays" describes the situation when more than one delay occurs simultaneously, either of which would alone delay the overall project. The responsibility of concurrent delays is usually attributable to opposing parties to the contract, such as owner and contractor. This often leads to disputes concerning the extent to which each of the parties is responsible for project delay. Lack of agreement on the approach to properly apportion the damages because of concurrent delays exists throughout the various legal systems worldwide. Most of the time, judgments with respect to apportionment because of concurrent delays by courts are based upon precedents and case law owing to lack of agreed to legal practice. Realizing such need, this study overviews and compares various approaches adopted by courts with respect to ruling on concurrent delay claims and apportionment under different legal system legal systems including the United States (U.S.), Canada, United Kingdom (U.K.), and Australia. This study concludes that in general the U.S. approach in dealing with concurrent delay claims is far more mature and relatively more consistent compared with the other studied legal systems.
机译:术语“并发延迟”描述了同时发生多个延迟的情况,其中任何一个都会单独延迟整个项目。并发延迟的责任通常归因于合同的相对方,例如所有者和承包商。这通常会引起各方对项目延误负责的争议。由于并发的延误,在全球范围内的各种法律体系中,对于适当分配损害赔偿金的方法都缺乏共识。在大多数情况下,由于法院同时拖延而导致的关于分摊的判决是基于判例和判例法的,这是由于缺乏商定的法律惯例。意识到这种需求,本研究概述并比较了法院在包括美国(U.S.),加拿大,英国(U.K.)和澳大利亚在内的不同法律制度法律体系下对同时延误索赔和分摊的裁决所采用的各种方法。这项研究得出的结论是,与其他已研究的法律体系相比,一般而言,美国处理并发延误索赔的方法要成熟得多,相对更一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号