首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Latin American Studies >Paradise for Whom? Conservatism and Progress in the Perception of Rio de Janeiro's Drinking-Water Supply, Sixteenth to Nineteenth Centuries
【24h】

Paradise for Whom? Conservatism and Progress in the Perception of Rio de Janeiro's Drinking-Water Supply, Sixteenth to Nineteenth Centuries

机译:谁的天堂?第十六到十九世纪里约热内卢的饮用水供应的保守性和进步

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the ways in which the perception of Rio de Janeiro's drinking water contributed to shaping the city's hydric management in colonial and imperial times. Even though the general assessment of climate and vegetation changed from paradisiacal to noxious in the second half of the eighteenth century in accordance with Enlightenment ideas, this had no effect on the locals' appreciation of the city's drinking water. The criteria for evaluating the quality and quantity of available water were based on works from classical antiquity and remained essentially unchanged from early colonial times to the end of the empire. Not even population growth and increasing susceptibility to epidemics in the nineteenth century induced the authorities to reform the water supply system, as they were confident that the city was provided with good and abundant water by virtue of its natural predisposition.
机译:本文探讨了对里约热内卢饮用水的理解如何在殖民时期和帝国时期塑造了该市的水管理。尽管按照启蒙运动的思想,对气候和植被的总体评估从天堂般的转变为有害的,但在18世纪下半叶却没有影响到当地人对城市饮用水的欣赏。评估可用水质和水量的标准是基于古代的作品,从殖民地早期到帝国末期基本上没有变化。甚至在19世纪,人口的增长和对流行病的易感性都没有引起当局改革供水系统,因为他们相信该市由于其自然的自然风光而获得了充足而丰富的水。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号