首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Islamic Law and Culture >War or peace in Israel? The Bin Baz-Qaradawi debate
【24h】

War or peace in Israel? The Bin Baz-Qaradawi debate

机译:以色列的战争还是和平?本·巴兹·卡拉达维辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

*This paper is dedicated to Professor Sherman A. Jackson. View all notesWould it be permissible (halal) for Palestinian Muslims to sign a peace treaty with Israel? In the mid-1990s, with Oslo Accords in the background, the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Bin Baz (1910-99), issued a fatwa affirming the permissibility and indeed desirability of such a treaty. In response, the ever-prominent Egyptian jurist Yusuf al-Qaradawi (1926-) issued a counter-fatwa in which he asserted that making peace with Israel would be impermissible (haram) and detrimental to the Palestinians. By the second round of this debate, the Bin Baz-Qaradawi dispute had captured the attention of the Arab and Muslim world. The present paper will examine each scholar's specific arguments and assessment of the facts on the ground. It will also situate this discourse in relation to classical and modern conceptions of jihad, including those advanced by contemporary scholars of Islam, particularly Sherman A. Jackson (in his article “Jihad and the Modern World”). It is argued that while Bin Baz might have been the peacemaker of the two in this particular case, his jihad doctrine - as presented in this very public scholarly debate - goes further in promoting a premodern, conquest-driven formulation of aggressive jihad and the Abode of Islam/Abode of War worldview that undergirds it. It is also maintained that Qaradawi's dismissal of the peace process was primarily the result of his particular reading of the facts on the ground; in fact, leaving aside the actual position of his fatwa, his theoretical framework could be utilized to some extent to support a robust jus ad bellum doctrine, one that accounts for modern institutions and developments. View full textDownload full textKeywordsIslam, sharia, jihad, Israel, Palestine, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, Bin Baz, Oslo AccordsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1528817X.2012.733129
机译:*本文专门针对谢尔曼·A·杰克逊教授。查看所有说明巴勒斯坦穆斯林是否可以与以色列签署和平条约(清真)?在1990年代中期,以《奥斯陆协定》为背景,沙特阿拉伯大穆夫提市的本·巴兹(Bin Baz,1910-99年)颁布了一项法特瓦声明,肯定了这项条约的容许性和确凿性。作为回应,久负盛名的埃及法学家尤素夫·卡拉达维(Yusuf al-Qaradawi,1926-)发表了反法塔瓦的言论,他断言,与以色列建立和平将是不可接受的(骚扰),并且不利于巴勒斯坦人。到第二轮辩论时,本·巴兹·卡拉达维之争已引起阿拉伯和穆斯林世界的注意。本文将考察每位学者的具体论点,并对当地的事实进行评估。还将把这种话语置于与圣战的古典和现代观念相关的位置上,包括当代伊斯兰学者,特别是谢尔曼·杰克逊(Sherman A. Jackson)(在他的文章“圣战与现代世界”中)提出的观念。有人争辩说,虽然本·巴兹在这种特殊情况下可能是两者的调和者,但正如本次公开学术辩论中所介绍的那样,他的圣战学说在促进以现代为基础,以征服为动力的激进圣战和阿卜杜德式提法中更进一步伊斯兰/战争住所世界观的基础。还有人认为,卡拉达维被解散和平进程的主要原因是他对实地事实的特别理解。实际上,撇开他的法特瓦的实际位置,他的理论框架可以在某种程度上被用来支持一种强有力的强制性法学说,该学说解释了现代制度和发展。查看全文下载全文关键词伊斯兰教,伊斯兰教法,圣战,以色列,巴勒斯坦,优素福·卡拉达维,本·巴兹,奥斯陆协定相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“同胞,网民,推特,技术,美味, linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多“,发布ID:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1528817X.2012.733129

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号