...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Investment Compliance >The SEC's enforcement of procedures to prevent insider trading
【24h】

The SEC's enforcement of procedures to prevent insider trading

机译:SEC执行程序以防止内幕交易

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this article is to analyze the SEC enforcement staff's recent scrutiny of the roles and responsibilities of securities firms for the protection of confidential information. Design/methodology/approach – The article reviews the SEC's implementation and enforcement of section 15(f) of the Exchange Act and section 204A of the Advisers Act. Part I discusses the legislative history of these provisions and reviews SEC and staff pronouncements relating to procedures for the protection of material nonpublic information. Part II discusses the potential consequences, from an enforcement perspective, of a firm's failure to satisfy the requirements of section 15(f) or section 204A. Part III describes the SEC's enforcement program in this area and distills guidance for securities firms from the SEC's actions. Findings – Sections 15(f) and 204A require brokers, dealers, and investment advisers to “establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed, taking into consideration the nature of such (broker, dealer, or investment adviser's) business, to prevent the misuse” of material nonpublic information. Thus, the statutory terms frame the issues in any SEC investigation. Does the firm maintain written procedures? Are the written procedures reasonably designed to safeguard material nonpublic information? In particular, are the procedures designed with a view toward the specific structure and business activities of the firm? Has the firm taken reasonable steps to enforce its written procedures? Practical implications – Given the SEC's current enforcement emphasis in this area, it is essential that brokers, dealers, and investment advisers look critically at whether they are taking adequate steps to protect the confidential information they may handle on a daily basis. Originality/value – The paper presents a practical guide by an experienced enforcement attorney.
机译:目的–本文的目的是分析SEC执法人员最近对证券公司在保护机密信息方面的作用和职责的审查。设计/方法/方法–文章回顾了SEC对《交易法》第15(f)条和《顾问法》第204A条的实施和执行。第一部分讨论了这些规定的立法历史,并回顾了SEC和有关保护重要非公开信息程序的工作人员声明。第二部分从执法角度讨论了企业未能满足第15(f)条或第204A条要求的潜在后果。第三部分介绍了SEC在这方面的执法计划,并从SEC的行动中提炼出对证券公司的指导。调查结果–第15(f)和204A节要求经纪人,交易商和投资顾问“考虑到此类(经纪人,交易商或投资顾问)业务的性质,“建立,维持和执行合理设计的书面政策和程序,以防止滥用重要非公开信息。因此,法定条款对任何SEC调查都构成了问题。公司是否维持书面程序?是否合理设计了书面程序以保护重大的非公开信息?特别是,程序的设计是否针对公司的特定结构和业务活动?公司是否已采取合理步骤执行其书面程序?实际影响–鉴于SEC当前在这一领域的执法重点,经纪人,交易商和投资顾问必须认真研究他们是否采取了适当的步骤来保护他们每天可能处理的机密信息。原创性/价值–该文件由经验丰富的执法律师提供实用指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号