...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling >Fallacies in the estimation of the validity of the Comparison Question Polygraph Test: A reply to Ginton (2020)
【24h】

Fallacies in the estimation of the validity of the Comparison Question Polygraph Test: A reply to Ginton (2020)

机译:估算比较问题的有效性的谬误测谎仪测试:答复到杜顿(2020)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In our recent review of the current status of forensic lie detection (Iacono & Ben-Shakhar, 2019), we critiqued a novel method for estimating comparison question polygraph technique accuracy introduced by Ginton (2013). Ginton (2020) has argued that we misconstrued and misinterpreted his study. In this rejoinder, we dismiss Ginton's (2020) critical points and maintain that his polygraph validity estimates cannot be trusted.
机译:在我们最近对法医级检测现状的审查中(IACONO与Ben-Shakhar,2019)批评了一种新的方法,用于估算GINTON(2013)引入的比较问题测谎技术准确性。 姜顿(2020年)认为我们误解并误解了他的研究。 在这个Rejoinder中,我们解雇了Ginton的(2020)关键点,并认为他的测谎仪有效性估计不能值得信任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号