首页> 外文期刊>Journal of international relations and development >The politics of law in a post-conflict UN protectorate: privatisation and property rights in Kosovo (1999-2008)
【24h】

The politics of law in a post-conflict UN protectorate: privatisation and property rights in Kosovo (1999-2008)

机译:冲突后联合国保护国的法律政治:科索沃的私有化和财产权(1999-2008年)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates the design and implementation of Kosovo's post-war privatisation regime with reference to the policy ideas developed and negotiated within the bounds of Kosovo's international transitional administration (UNMIK). Drawing on constructivist analyses of institutional change, we rely on semi-structured interviews with international officials and a review of legal documents to argue that the process of institutional change was driven largely by a contest between conflicting legal norms, rather than a contest between politically organised interest-based groups. International legal experts mobilised various competing normative paradigms residing in the background of policy debates to persuade domestic political actors that privatisation was in their interest, and to legitimise or disqualify the proposed neoliberal privatisation programme. However, the lack of consensus on the background paradigm ushered in a protracted period of ideational contestation. Privatisation in post-war Kosovo was essentially about the 'politics of law', as the legalisation of privatisation policy led inevitably to the contentious politicisation of legal norms.
机译:本文参照科索沃国际过渡行政当局(科索沃特派团)范围内制定和谈判的政策构想,对科索沃战后私有化制度的设计和实施进行了调查。借助对制度变迁的建构主义分析,我们依靠对国际官员的半结构化访谈和对法律文件的审查,认为制度变迁的过程主要是由相互冲突的法律规范之间的竞争所驱动,而不是由政治组织之间的竞争所驱动。基于兴趣的群体。国际法律专家动员了各种在政策辩论背景下相互竞争的规范范式,以说服国内政治参与者私有化符合其利益,并使拟议的新自由主义私有化计划合法化或取消其资格。但是,由于缺乏关于背景范式的共识,导致了观念竞赛的漫长时期。战后科索沃的私有化实质上是关于“法律政治”的,因为私有化政策的合法化不可避免地导致了有争议的法律规范政治化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号