首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Money and Finance >Is China or India more financially open?
【24h】

Is China or India more financially open?

机译:中国或印度在财务上是否更开放?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Measures of de facto capital account openness for China and India raise the question whether the Chinn-lto measure of de jure capital account openness is useful and whether the Lane-Milesi-Ferretti measure of de facto openness ranks the two countries correctly. We examine eight dimensions of de facto capital account openness. Four measures based on onshore and offshore prices test the law of one price. Among the four quantity measures, we introduce two new ones into the debate: the openness of consolidated banking systems and the internationalization of currencies. Generally, the measures show both economies becoming more financially open over time. In six of the eight dimensions, the Indian economy appears to be more open financially. Nevertheless, policy continues to segment onshore and offshore markets in both and policymakers face challenges in further financial integration.
机译:中国和印度事实上的资本账户开放度的标准提出了一个问题,即法律上的资本账户开放度的Chinn-lto度量是否有用,以及事实上的开放度的Lane-Milesi-Ferretti度量是否正确地对两国进行了排名。我们研究了事实上的资本账户开放度的八个方面。基于在岸价格和离岸价格的四种度量标准检验了一种价格规律。在这四个数量指标中,我们引入了两个新的指标:合并银行体系的开放性和货币的国际化。总体而言,这些措施表明,随着时间的推移,两个经济体的金融开放程度都将提高。在八个维度中的六个维度中,印度经济在财务上似乎更加开放。尽管如此,政策仍在继续分割陆上和海上市场,决策者在进一步进行金融整合方面面临挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号