首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Money and Finance >Are individual or institutional investors the agents of bubbles?
【24h】

Are individual or institutional investors the agents of bubbles?

机译:个人或机构投资者是泡沫的推动者吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Behavioral bubble models typically assume that uninformed trend-chasers, presumably individual investors, cause bubbles, while informed contrarian investors such as institutions, trade against bubbles. DeLong et al. (1990a) highlight that to be considered a "bubble", the mis-pricing must prevail in a large, diversified portfolio. To meet this criterion, we use a unique dataset of all transactions by investor type for all non-financial Korean firms, and find evidence at odds with such assumptions. Domestic individual investors systematically apply aggressive contrarian trades, while foreign and some domestic institutions are mostly trend-chasers. These findings suggest that institutional investors rather than individuals are agents of bubbles. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:行为泡沫模型通常假设不知情的趋势追踪者(大概是个人投资者)会导致泡沫,而机构等知情的逆向投资者则会与泡沫进行交易。 DeLong等。 (1990a)强调,要想被认为是“泡沫”,定价错误必须在一个庞大的,多元化的投资组合中盛行。为了满足此条件,我们对所有韩国非金融公司使用了按投资者类型划分的所有交易的唯一数据集,并发现与此类假设不一致的证据。国内个人投资者系统地进行激进的逆向交易,而外国和一些国内机构大多是趋势追赶者。这些发现表明,机构投资者而非个人是泡沫的推动者。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号