首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Money and Finance >Centralised or decentralised banking supervision? Evidence from European banks
【24h】

Centralised or decentralised banking supervision? Evidence from European banks

机译:集中或分散的银行监督?来自欧洲银行的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper analyses the impact of the Banking Union on European bank credit risk. Specifically, we investigate the effect that the establishment of the Single Supervisory Mechanism has had on the credit risk of the banks it supervises in comparison to financial institutions that are still supervised by National Supervisory Authorities. We analyse a sample of 746 European banks over the period 2011-2018, by means of a difference-in-differences methodology. We provide empirical evidence that Single Supervisory Mechanism supervised banks reduced credit risk exposure compared to banks supervised by National Supervisory Authorities, suggesting that the Banking Union has successfully reduced the riskiness of the European banking sector. Our results passed a battery of robustness tests that support the reliability of our analysis. Our contribution sheds light on the benefits of centralised versus decentralised supervision, on the effectiveness of the current supervisory system in Europe, and on its impact on European bank risk. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:本文分析了银行联盟对欧洲银行信贷风险的影响。具体而言,我们调查了单一监督机制的建立对银行的信用风险与国家监管机构仍然监督的金融机构的信用风险的影响。我们通过差异差异方法分析2011 - 2018年期间746个欧洲银行的样本。我们提供了与国家监管机构监督的银行相比,单一监督机制监督银行监督风险敞口减少信贷风险敞口,这表明银行联盟已成功降低欧洲银行业的风险。我们的结果通过了一种稳健性测试的电池,支持我们分析的可靠性。我们的贡献阐明了集中式与分散监督的好处,就欧洲当前监督系统的有效性以及对欧洲银行风险的影响。 (c)2020由elestvier有限公司发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号