...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Economics >Price gaps at the border: Evidence from multi-country household scanner data
【24h】

Price gaps at the border: Evidence from multi-country household scanner data

机译:边境价格差距:来自多国家庭扫描仪数据的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Studies employing micro price data to examine the extent of international goods market integration tend to find that borders imply arbitrage-impeding transaction costs, inducing market segmentation. Within monetary unions, these effects are found to be very minor though, at least when online prices are considered. However, analyzing household scanner price data from three euro area member states, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands, we document that households face (and pay) significantly different prices for identical goods across these countries in the vast majority (around 75%) of cases considered. For regions within countries, as a counterfactual, however, no evidence for such effects exists. Employing cross-border shopping information, we are able to draw direct conclusions about the question of integration of markets for a substantial number of goods. In addition, we can also derive a measure of border costs for most of them. For goods, for which no cross-border shopping take place, we provide a lower bound for border costs in the majority of cases. In line with existing evidence, our findings suggest considerable heterogeneities in border costs. Median values generally range between 15% and 20% (of the price of a good) for exact border cost estimates and between 18% and 20% for the derived lower bounds. Considering the distribution of values obtained suggests that most values lie in a range of +/- 40%. Since our data set comprises purchase information from all major retailers present in a given market, we are also able to examine the role of retailer heterogeneity for cross-border price gap estimates. Differences in retailer composition turn out to be fairly small, however. Grouping goods by various characteristics reveals that goods purchased more often tend to exhibit somewhat bigger border estimates. Considering the price or the goods category, however, does not yield any conclusive insights. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:雇用微价数据的研究审查国际商品市场一体化的程度往往发现边界意味着套利阻碍交易成本,诱导市场细分。在货币工会中,发现这些效果非常小,至少在线价格被考虑。然而,分析了来自三个欧元区成员国,比利时,德国和荷兰的家庭扫描仪价格数据,我们记录了家庭面临(并支付)在绝大多数(约75%)的案件中,这些国家的相同商品的价格明显不同经过考虑的。然而,对于各国内部的地区,作为反事实,没有存在此类效果的证据。雇用跨境购物信息,我们能够为大量商品融入市场的融合问题。此外,我们还可以为大多数人推导出边界成本的衡量标准。对于没有跨境购物的货物,我们在大多数情况下为边境成本提供了下限。符合现有证据,我们的研究结果表明了边境成本的相当大的异质性。中位值通常为派生下限的确切边境成本估计值15%至20%(价格优良)之间的15%至20%(价格为好)。考虑所获得的值分布表明,大多数值位于+/- 40%的范围内。由于我们的数据集包括来自给定市场中所有主要零售商的购买信息,我们还能够检查零售商异质性对跨境价格差距估计的作用。然而,零售商组成的差异变得相当小。通过各种特征分组商品揭示了购买的商品往往往往呈现出一些更大的边界估计。然而,考虑到价格或货物类别,不会产生任何结论性见解。 (c)2020 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号