【24h】

Societas delinquere non potest ?

机译:社会不能错吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The concept of corporate criminal responsibility has long been accepted in common law jurisdictions and has more recently spread to several other national criminal law systems. Germany is one of a few hold-outs limiting criminal responsibility to natural persons, although financial sanctions can be imposed on a corporation when one of its officers has acted criminally on behalf of the corporation. Corporate criminal responsibility can be based on transferring the corporate officer's responsibility to the corporation, or alternatively, on finding fault with the legal person's internal organization. Neither approach is completely convincing in theoretical terms. More importantly, introducing full corporate criminal responsibility requires a re-definition of what constitutes a criminal act as well as the concept of criminal culpability. The author cautions against taking this step too quickly because it might well change the specific nature of criminal law.
机译:公司刑事责任的概念早已在普通法管辖区接受,并且最近已传播到其他几个国家刑法体系。德国是少数几个将刑事责任限制于自然人的保留措施之一,尽管当公司的一名官员代表该公司采取犯罪行为时,仍可对其施加经济制裁。公司的刑事责任可以基于将公司管理人员的责任转移给公司,也可以基于发现法人的内部组织有过错。从理论上讲,这两种方法都不能完全令人信服。更重要的是,引入全面的公司刑事责任要求重新定义犯罪行为的构成以及犯罪责任的概念。作者告诫不要过快地采取这一步骤,因为这很可能会改变刑法的具体性质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号