首页> 外文期刊>Resource sharing & information networks >Guest Editorial: An Opinion on the Opinion-An Access Services Librarian's Perspective on the Georgia State Ruling
【24h】

Guest Editorial: An Opinion on the Opinion-An Access Services Librarian's Perspective on the Georgia State Ruling

机译:客座社论:对意见的一种看法-无障碍服务图书馆员对乔治亚州统治的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

David slays the Goliaths! See you in the Eleventh Circuit! The final score is Panthers 94, Publishers 5. These are a sample of the statements that have been made by pundits, scholars, reporters, and similar individuals regarding the Georgia State ruling. To be exact, they are paraphrases because I cannot recall the precise origins of these few amongst the plethora of pithy catch phrases I have heard or read since May 11, 2012. Many of the phrases convey their author's conviction regarding Federal District Court Judge Orinda Evans's 350-page opinion, and many authors seem to put the ruling in black-or-white, win-or-lose dichotomies (or in limbo if one believes an appeal is imminent).
机译:大卫杀了巨人!在第十一巡回赛见!最终分数是Panthers 94,出版商5。这些是专家,学者,记者和类似人士就乔治亚州裁决所作的陈述的样本。确切地说,它们是措辞,因为我无法回忆起自2012年5月11日以来我听到或读到的大量虚假的流行短语中的那几个的确切来源。许多短语传达了他们对联邦地方法院法官Orinda Evans的信念。长达350页的意见书,许多作者似乎将裁定分为黑白,双赢或二分法(或者,如果有人认为上诉迫在眉睫,则将其定为死刑)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Resource sharing & information networks》 |2012年第2期|67-71|共5页
  • 作者

    Mark de Jong;

  • 作者单位

    Information and Library Services University of Maryland University College Adelphi, Maryland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号