首页> 外文期刊>Journal of institutional economics >The French revolution and German industrialization: dubious models and doubtful causality
【24h】

The French revolution and German industrialization: dubious models and doubtful causality

机译:法国大革命和德国工业化:可疑的模式和可疑的因果关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We challenge the big-bang' approach to economic history offered by Acemoglu et al. (2011). The creation story in dispute is the French Revolution and the subsequent French occupation of a very small portion of Germany. We show that the four institutional reforms claimed to have spurred German industrialization have been incorrectly dated. These corrections nullify any explanatory power of the ACJR econometric model. Moreover, even with the corrected vintages, their identification strategy is undermined by a flawed explanatory' variable - years of reform'. We show that this variable simply enters their model as a year trend and explains nothing except the passage of time. We develop a fixed-effects model to capture the overlooked role of coal production that began in several regions shortly after 1840. This model offers a credible account of German industrialization and urbanization. Most economic change is, after all, continuous. Big-bang intrusions are of doubtful efficacy.
机译:我们对Acemoglu等人提出的经济史大爆炸方法提出质疑。 (2011)。有争议的创作故事是法国大革命和随后的法国占领德国一小部分。我们表明,四项声称刺激了德国工业化的体制改革的日期不正确。这些更正无效了ACJR计量经济学模型的任何解释能力。此外,即使改正了年份,其识别策略也会因有缺陷的解释性“变量-改革年”而受到损害。我们表明,该变量只是以年趋势的形式进入其模型,除了时间的流逝,没有任何解释。我们开发了一种固定效应模型,以捕捉煤炭生产在1840年后不久开始在多个地区被忽视的作用。该模型提供了德国工业化和城市化的可靠说明。毕竟,大多数经济变化是持续的。大爆炸入侵的功效令人怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号