首页> 外文期刊>Journal of institutional economics >A machine-learning history of English caselaw and legal ideas prior to the Industrial Revolution Ⅱ: applications
【24h】

A machine-learning history of English caselaw and legal ideas prior to the Industrial Revolution Ⅱ: applications

机译:工业革命前的英国案例法和法律思想的机器学习历史Ⅱ:应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This is the second of two papers that generate and analyze quantitative estimates of the development of English caselaw and associated legal ideas before the Industrial Revolution. In the first paper, we estimated a 100-topic structural topic model, named the topics, and showed how to interpret topic-prevalence timelines. Here, we provide examples of new insights that can be gained from these estimates. We first provide a bird's-eye view, aggregating the topics into 15 themes. Procedure is the highest-prevalence theme, but by the mid-18th century attention to procedure decreases sharply, indicating solidification of court institutions. Important ideas on real-property were substantially settled by the mid-17th century and on contracts and torts by the mid-18th century. Thus, crucial elements of caselaw developed before the Industrial Revolution. We then examine the legal ideas associated with England's financial revolution. Many new legal ideas relevant to finance were well accepted before the Glorious Revolution. Finally, we examine the sources of law used in the courts. Emphasis on precedent-based reasoning increases by 1650, but diffusion was gradual, with pertinent ideas solidifying only after 1700. Ideas on statute applicability were accepted by the mid-16th century but debates on legislative intent were still occurring in 1750.
机译:这是两篇论文中的第二个,在工业革命之前产生和分析了英语棺材和相关法律思想的量化估计。在第一篇论文中,我们估计了一个100主题的结构主题模型,命名为主题,并显示了如何解释主题普及时间表。在这里,我们提供了可以从这些估计中获得的新见解的例子。我们首先提供鸟瞰图,将主题汇总为15个主题。程序是最普遍的主题,但在18世纪中期的注意力下降急剧下降,表明法院机构的凝固。关于现实财产的重要想法在17世纪中期和18世纪中期的合同和侵权行为中大大定位。因此,在工业革命之前开发的棺材的关键要素。然后,我们检查与英格兰的金融革命相关的法律思想。在光荣的革命之前,许多与金融相关的新法律思想得到了很好的接受。最后,我们研究了法院使用的法律来源。重点是基于先例的推理,增加了1650年,但扩散逐渐逐渐,只有在1700之后才能巩固。19世纪中期的关于法规适用性的思考,但在1750年仍然发生了关于立法意图的辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号