...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of institutional economics >Taxonomic definitions in social science, with firms, markets and institutions as case studies
【24h】

Taxonomic definitions in social science, with firms, markets and institutions as case studies

机译:社会科学中的分类学定义,以公司,市场和机构为案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Definitions are crucial for institutional analysis. This article explains the nature of taxonomic definitions, with particular attention to their use in economics and other social sciences. Taxonomic definitions demarcate one species of entity from another. They are vital for the communication of meaning between scientists, who must share some basic conception of what types of entity they are investigating, to establish a division of labour over subsequent theoretical analysis and empirical investigation of the type of entity defined. Generally, taxonomic definitions build on past usage and are parsimonious: they are not meant to be explanations or descriptions. By contrast, overloaded taxonomic definitions can create square-one disagreement about what is being investigated. As illustrative examples, the paper considers different degrees of progress with attempts to define firms, markets and institutions.
机译:定义对于制度分析至关重要。本文解释了分类学定义的性质,特别注意它们在经济学和其他社会科学中的使用。分类学定义将一个实体的物种与另一个实体进行了划分。它们对于科学家之间的意义交流至关重要,科学家们必须就他们所研究的实体类型共享一些基本概念,以便在随后的理论分析和对所定义实体类型的实证研究中建立分工。通常,分类学定义建立在过去的使用基础上,并且是简约的:它们并不意味着进行解释或描述。相比之下,过载的分类学定义会导致对所研究内容的平方一分歧。作为说明性示例,本文考虑了尝试定义公司,市场和机构的不同程度的进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号