首页> 外文期刊>Journal of informetrics >Comparison of two article-level, field-independent citation metrics: Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)
【24h】

Comparison of two article-level, field-independent citation metrics: Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)

机译:两种文章级别,与字段无关的引用指标的比较:字段加权引用影响(FWCI)和相对引用比率(RCR)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We reproduce the article-level, field-independent citation metric Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) using the Scopus database, and extend it beyond the biomedical field to all subject areas. We compare the RCR to the Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI), also an article-level, field-normalised metric, and present the first results of correlations, distributions and application to research university benchmarking for both metrics. Our analyses demonstrate that FWCI and RCR of articles correlate with varying strengths across different areas of research. Additionally, we observe that both metrics are comparably stable across different subject areas of research. Moreover, at the level of universities, both metrics correlate strongly. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:我们使用Scopus数据库重现文章级别,与字段无关的引用度量标准相对引用比率(RCR),并将其扩展到生物医学领域以外的所有主题领域。我们将RCR与现场加权引文影响(FWCI)进行了比较,FWCI也是文章级别的字段规范化指标,并给出了相关性,分布和在这两个指标的研究大学基准测试中的初步应用结果。我们的分析表明,文章的FWCI和RCR与不同研究领域的不同优势相关。此外,我们观察到,这两个指标在不同的研究领域中都比较稳定。此外,在大学一级,两个指标密切相关。 (C)2019作者。由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号