首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Information Science >Knowledge management: the distinctive roles of knowledge assets in facilitating knowledge creation
【24h】

Knowledge management: the distinctive roles of knowledge assets in facilitating knowledge creation

机译:知识管理:知识资产在促进知识创造中的独特作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A comprehensive and feasible model that delineates the interrelationships between knowledge assets and knowledge creation processes has not been explored in the literature. This study aims to fill this void. Unlike previous research, this study investigates the interrelations among four categories of knowledge assets and four knowledge creation processes - socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization (SECI) [9]. In our framework, we argue that different types of knowledge assets may have differing influences on knowledge creation. In order to test the feasibility of this framework, we conducted an empirical research exercise. This study employed a survey instrument to collect data from a wide variety of organizations in manufacturing, trade, transportation and service industries, computer industries, finance, and academic institutions. A total of 204 usable responses were analysed. We identified four interrelationships from this study. (1) Compared to other knowledge assets, conceptual knowledge assets have a greater effect on externalization of knowledge creation process; (2) compared to other knowledge assets, routine knowledge assets have a greater effect on socialization of knowledge creation process; (3) compared to other knowledge assets, experiential knowledge assets do not have a greater effect on internalization of the knowledge creation process; and (4) compared to other knowledge assets, systemic knowledge assets do not have a greater effect on the combination of knowledge creation process. The implications of the study are discussed, and further research directions are proposed.
机译:文献中尚未探讨描述知识资产与知识创造过程之间相互关系的综合可行模型。这项研究旨在填补这一空白。与以往的研究不同,本研究调查了四种知识资产和四个知识创造过程之间的相互关系-社会化,外部化,组合和内部化(SECI)[9]。在我们的框架中,我们认为不同类型的知识资产可能对知识创造产生不同的影响。为了测试该框架的可行性,我们进行了一项实证研究。这项研究使用了一种调查工具来收集来自制造业,贸易,运输和服务业,计算机行业,金融和学术机构的各种组织的数据。总共分析了204个可用响应。我们从这项研究中确定了四个相互关系。 (1)与其他知识资产相比,概念性知识资产对知​​识创造过程的外部化影响更大; (2)与其他知识资产相比,常规知识资产对知​​识创造过程的社会化影响更大; (3)与其他知识资产相比,体验型知识资产对知​​识创造过程的内部化影响不大; (4)与其他知识资产相比,系统性知识资产对知​​识创造过程的组合影响不大。讨论了该研究的意义,并提出了进一步的研究方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号