首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Information & Optimization Sciences >Decision making for integrating a securities firm with a financial holding company: comparison between the NPV method and the binomial option approach
【24h】

Decision making for integrating a securities firm with a financial holding company: comparison between the NPV method and the binomial option approach

机译:证券公司与金融控股公司合并的决策:NPV方法和二项式期权方法之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study attempts to provide a foundation for decision making regarding integrating (merging) a securities firm with a financial holding company. Besides calculating the static value using the conventionally adopted net present value method, the potential value through strategic flexibility is also measured using a binomial option approach. This study obtains the following findings. First, based on evaluation with the net present value method, the securities firm should immediately be integrated with the financial holding company. However, the firm value may be underestimated by failing to consider strategic flexibility. Second, the integration should be delayed by using a binomial option approach. Third, the value of the securities firm increases with the range of options (available for consideration). Fourth, given variation in risk-free interest rate, firm value, strike price, time to maturity, and value volatility, the option value may influence the timing of firm decision making.
机译:这项研究试图为将证券公司与金融控股公司合并(合并)的决策提供基础。除了使用常规采用的净现值方法计算静态值之外,还使用二项式期权方法来衡量通过战略灵活性产生的潜在价值。本研究获得以下发现。首先,基于净现值法的评估,证券公司应立即与金融控股公司合并。但是,如果不考虑战略灵活性,可能会低估企业价值。其次,应该通过使用二项式期权方法来延迟整合。第三,证券公司的价值随着期权范围的增加而增加(可供考虑)。第四,鉴于无风险利率,公司价值,执行价格,到期时间和价值波动性的变化,期权价值可能会影响公司决策的时机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号