首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History >Further Thoughts on Imperial Absent-Mindedness
【24h】

Further Thoughts on Imperial Absent-Mindedness

机译:关于皇室缺席的进一步思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When my The Absent-Minded Imperialists was published in 20041 it stimulated - or provoked - a great deal of discussion. Among those most provoked were Antoinette Burton, who dismissed the book as not 'worth arguing either with or about',2 and John MacKenzie: 'some reviewers may be taken in by this, but I am not'.3 Other reviews, of course, were more positive. This paper is partly a reply to some of the more critical ones, but also seeks to place the general debate on the domestic impact of British imperialism in context, and will finish with a suggestion for moving it forward in a new way.
机译:当我的《缺席的帝国主义者》于20041年出版时,它激发或引发了很多讨论。其中最惹人注意的是安托瓦内特·伯顿(Antoinette Burton),他认为这本书“不值得争论”,[2]和约翰·麦肯齐(John MacKenzie):“有些评论家可能对此表示欢迎,但我不是。” 3当然,其他评论,比较积极。本文在某种程度上是对一些更为关键的文章的答复,但也试图将英国帝国主义对国内影响的一般性辩论放在语境中,并最后提出以新的方式推进它的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号