首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hydrologic engineering >Uncertainty Analysis of Flood Control Measures Including Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainties: Probability Theory and Evidence Theory
【24h】

Uncertainty Analysis of Flood Control Measures Including Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainties: Probability Theory and Evidence Theory

机译:包括认知不确定性和通风不确定性在内的防洪措施的不确定性分析:概率论和证据论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Encountering uncertainty in engineering design problems is inevitable. Probability theory is a traditional method for uncertainty analysis despite the nature of uncertainties (i.e.,aleatory or epistemic). Because of some limitations of probability theory in analyzing epistemic uncertainty, new methods such as evidence theory have been developed. This paper describes the analysis of uncertainty by means of both probability and evidence theories. Monte Carlo simulation is used along with the two theories to propagate the uncertainty. A computational strategy based on random sampling is used to analyze and represent the epistemic and aleatory uncertainty. Despite its advantage, the application of evidence theory in civil engineering is limited because of its mathematical complexities. This paper attempts to make this theory more applicable by using practical design problems, as well as by highlighting its advantages compared with probability theory. Three hypothetical flood-control-related problems are considered. The uncertainty of a design storm intensity resulting from an experimental equation and a design discharge resulting from the rational method are analyzed assuming storm intensity as a stochastic variable with Level 2 (i.e.,both aleatory and epistemic) uncertainties. The design diameter of the pipes in a stormwater collection system is estimated. It is assumed that the input parameters have only epistemic uncertainty. The results show that if the desired risk changes, some diameters may stay fixed and some may change. The design of a flood control levee is considered. The levee height is an output variable, and it is assumed that the design discharge has Level 2 uncertainty, whereas all other inputs have epistemic uncertainty. The results of uncertainty analysis with the two theories are represented appropriately, discussed, and compared. Compared with probability theory, evidence theory offers more insight for decision makers when they encounter epistemic and/ or aleatory uncertainties in design problems.
机译:在工程设计中遇到不确定性是不可避免的。尽管不确定性(即偶然的或认知的)的性质,概率论是用于不确定性分析的传统方法。由于概率论在分析认知不确定性方面的某些局限性,因此开发了诸如证据论等新方法。本文通过概率和证据理论描述了不确定性的分析。蒙特卡罗模拟与这两种理论一起用于传播不确定性。基于随机抽样的计算策略用于分析和表示认知和偶然不确定性。尽管有其优势,但由于其数学上的复杂性,证据理论在土木工程中的应用受到了限制。本文试图通过使用实际的设计问题以及通过突出其与概率论相比的优势来使该理论更适用。考虑了三个假设的防洪相关问题。假设风暴强度是具有2级不确定性(即偶然性和认知性)的随机变量,则对由实验方程式得出的设计风暴强度和由有理方法得出的设计排放量的不确定性进行了分析。估算雨水收集系统中管道的设计直径。假设输入参数仅具有认知不确定性。结果表明,如果所需的风险发生变化,某些直径可能会保持不变,而某些直径可能会发生变化。考虑防洪堤的设计。堤坝高度是一个输出变量,假定设计流量具有2级不确定性,而所有其他输入都具有认知不确定性。用两种理论对不确定性分析的结果进行了适当的表示,讨论和比较。与概率论相比,证据理论为决策者在设计问题中遇到认知和/或偶然的不确定性时提供了更多的见识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号