首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydraulic Engineering >Estimation of the Dispersion Coefficient in Natural Rivers Using a Granular Computing Model
【24h】

Estimation of the Dispersion Coefficient in Natural Rivers Using a Granular Computing Model

机译:基于颗粒计算模型的自然河流弥散系数估算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Because pollutant dispersion in rivers is strongly influenced by the longitudinal dispersion coefficient (K-x), its accurate estimation is critical in the field of environmentally sound hydraulic engineering. In this study, a granular computing (GC) model was explored for the first time to overcome problems in accurately estimating K-x. Because GC is a black-box model that is not user friendly, an appropriate nonlinear regression (NLR) method was also applied to precisely predict K-x. The inclusion of the generally ignored parameter of river curvature in K-x estimation significantly improved NLR model performance. In so doing, both GC and NLR model estimations of K-x achieved high linear coefficients of determination (R-2) and small error indices [root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE)] with respect to measured Kx values. The same analysis showed that the GC model (with R-2, RMSE, and MAE values equal to 0.997, 8.11, and 2.18, respectively), outperformed the NLR model, particularly for extreme high values of K-x. Similarly to previous studies, it was also found that the most effective parameters on K-x were the channel aspect ratio, friction term, and river curvature, respectively, in descending order of importance. Moreover, a comparison between some well-known K-x models and the developed GC and NLR alternative presented here showed the latter to have outperformed the former, indicating that the GC and NLR models are a good choice for K-x prediction. (c) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
机译:由于河流中污染物的扩散受到纵向扩散系数(K-x)的强烈影响,因此其准确估算对于无害水力工程领域至关重要。在这项研究中,首次探索了颗粒计算(GC)模型,以克服准确估算K-x时遇到的问题。由于GC是一个黑匣子模型,因此对用户不友好,因此还应用了适当的非线性回归(NLR)方法来精确预测K-x。在K-x估算中包括通常被忽略的河流曲率参数,可显着改善NLR模型的性能。这样,相对于测得的Kx值,K-x的GC和NLR模型估计都实现了高线性测定系数(R-2)和小的误差指标[均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)]。相同的分析表明,GC模型(R-2,RMSE和MAE值分别等于0.997、8.11和2.18)优于NLR模型,特别是对于极高的K-x值。与以前的研究相似,还发现K-x上最有效的参数分别是通道长宽比,摩擦项和河流曲率,按照重要性从高到低的顺序排列。此外,将一些著名的K-x模型与此处介绍的已开发的GC和NLR替代方案进行比较,结果表明后者的性能优于前者,这表明GC和NLR模型是K-x预测的不错选择。 (c)2017年美国土木工程师学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号