首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Rights >Transnational Understandings of Secularisms and Their Impact on the Right to Religious Freedom—Exploring Religious Symbols Cases at the UN and ECHR
【24h】

Transnational Understandings of Secularisms and Their Impact on the Right to Religious Freedom—Exploring Religious Symbols Cases at the UN and ECHR

机译:对世俗主义的跨国理解及其对宗教自由权的影响-在联合国和欧洲人权法院探讨宗教标志案件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Drawing on a theoretical approach that understands secularism to be an authoritative discourse that shapes the boundaries of the religiously acceptable in a modern nation-state, this article explores the usage by international human rights bodies (United Nations bodies and European Court of Human Rights) of secularism in religious freedom cases. More specifically, the article investigates how, while both those bodies ground their rulings and opinions on religious symbols in secularism, they propose alternative readings of the term, which in turn affects the boundaries of the right to religious freedom and therefore the politics enabled by this right. This finding has theoretical implications, as it does not only highlight how secularism and religious freedom are deeply interrelated but also points to the fact that the meaning of the “universal” right to religious freedom is unstable and a source of debate between transnational human rights spaces. Moreover, this has repercussions at the praxis level, where the hegemony of secularism accompanied by a shift in meaning affects both the discourse and strategies of plaintiffs.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2012.674460
机译:本文采用一种理论方法,将世俗主义理解为塑造现代民族国家宗教可接受范围的权威话语,并探讨了国际人权机构(联合国机构和欧洲人权法院)对宗教自由案件中的世俗主义。更具体地说,本文调查了这两个机构如何在世俗主义中将其裁决和观点作为宗教符号的基础,同时又提出了该术语的替代解读,这反过来又影响了宗教自由权的界限,因此影响了宗教自由权的政治作用对。这一发现具有理论意义,因为它不仅突出了世俗主义与宗教自由之间的深层联系,而且指出了以下事实:宗教自由的“普遍”权利的含义是不稳定的,并且是跨国之间争论的根源。人权空间。此外,这在实践层面上会产生影响,世俗主义的霸权伴随意义的转变会影响原告的话语和策略。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact: “ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2012.674460

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Human Rights》 |2012年第2期|p.263-279|共17页
  • 作者

    Amélie Barrasa;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:13:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号