首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Rights Practice >One NHRI or Many? How Many Institutions Does It Take to Protect Human Rights? – Lessons from the European Experience
【24h】

One NHRI or Many? How Many Institutions Does It Take to Protect Human Rights? – Lessons from the European Experience

机译:一个或多个NHRI?保护人权需要多少机构? –欧洲经验教训

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The question of whether to establish a single national human rights institution (NHRI) with a broad mandate or multiple specialized institutions is a pressing one in several European countries, yet has been largely neglected in the academic literature. Many states have gradually acquired specialized institutions, addressing particular grounds of discrimination or the rights of different vulnerable groups. Often for reasons of cost, the wisdom of having many institutions is being questioned, and several countries – the United Kingdom (UK), Sweden, Croatia, for example – have merged multiple institutions or are considering such a step.
机译:在几个欧洲国家中,建立一个具有广泛授权的单一国家人权机构(NHRI)还是建立多个专门机构的问题是一个紧迫的问题,但在学术文献中却一直被忽略。许多州逐渐建立了专门机构,以解决歧视或不同弱势群体的权利的特殊理由。通常出于成本原因,人们质疑拥有许多机构的智慧,例如英国(UK),瑞典,克罗地亚等几个国家已经合并了多个机构,或正在考虑采取这一步骤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号