...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of housing and the built environment >Keeping the doors open: experimenting science-policy-practice interfaces in Africa for sustainable urban development
【24h】

Keeping the doors open: experimenting science-policy-practice interfaces in Africa for sustainable urban development

机译:保持门开放:在非洲进行非洲的科学政策实践界面进行可持续城市发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Academics and policy-makers are increasingly being challenged to acknowledge that their knowledge is necessary but insufficient in addressing the complex challenges associated with global urbanization. But few studies offer a coherent framing of how actors from aca-demia, policy and local communities can interface and build synergies for resolving urban sustainability challenges. This paper presents three parameters along which science-policy-practice interfaces for urban sustainability can be understood. The three parameters are: (1) co-framing research agendas; (2) co-designing methodologies; and (3) co-experimentation of scalable solutions. Co-framing research agendas speaks to the process of jointly developing research problems and questions from on a particular or interrelated set of urban sustainability challenges. Co-designing methodologies centers on the spectrum of approaches and methods for generating and sharing knowledge that is scientifically credible, relevant to policy and socially valuable. Co-experimentation refers to testing or taking to scale locally-embedded solutions that can resonate with systemic change at wider scales. To illustrate the contextual meanings and dynamics of these three parameters, case studies of interfaces amongst academic and non-academic actors are presented from cities of Durban, Stellenbosch and Kampala. The case studies demonstrate that all the parameters mean altering the positionality of local communities and policy-makers, from end-users to co-bearers of knowledge with scientists from academia. None of the case studies indicates that one parameter is a step to another, rather the emphasis is on reflexive modes of collaboration amongst the actors involved to permit the co-production of knowledge.
机译:学者和政策制定者越来越挑战承认他们的知识是必要的,而是不足以解决与全球城市化相关的复杂挑战。但是,很少有研究提供了ACA-Demia,政策和当地社区如何界面和建立解决城市可持续发展挑战的协同作用的连贯框架。本文呈三个参数,可以理解城市可持续性的科学政策实践界面。三个参数是:(1)共同框架研究议程; (2)共同设计方法; (3)可扩展解决方案的共同实验。共同框架研究议程谈到与特定或相互关联的城市可持续发展挑战联合开发研究问题和问题的过程。共同设计方法中心关于产生和分享科学衡量的知识的方法和方法的频谱,与政策和社会有价值相关。共同实验是指测试或采取措施,缩放可以在更广泛的尺度上产生全身变化的局部嵌入式解决方案。为了说明这三个参数的上下文含义和动态,从德班,Stellenbosch和Kampala的城市提出了学术和非学术作用者之间的接口的案例研究。案例研究表明,所有参数都意味着改变当地社区和政策制定者的位置,从最终用户到来自学术界的科学家的知识共同承担。没有一个案例研究表明一个参数是另一个参数对另一个参数,相反,强调是涉及的演员之间的反身合作模式,允许共同生产知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号