...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Historical Geography >Notes on a geographical canon? Measures, models and scholarly enterprise
【24h】

Notes on a geographical canon? Measures, models and scholarly enterprise

机译:地理教规上的注释?措施,模式和学术型企业

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper provides an introduction to the theme issue by placing recent discussions about the geographical canon within scholarly debates about canonicity. Geographers have been generally silent about canon but, to the contrary, possess a sophisticated grasp of related concepts such as tradition and paradigm. It is argued that there is no clear canonical conception that geographers should adopt, but that further attention towards the canonical is nevertheless merited. Engagement with the geographical canon is not prescriptive. Rather, its construction will be a personal choice that involves engagement with a broader community of scholarship. In doing so, though, productive avenues are created for consideration of the texts, habits and practices that identify geography. It is concluded that debates about canonicity provide much for considerations of historiography and pedagogy by geographers. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文通过将有关地理规范的最新讨论放入有关规范性的学术辩论中,对主题问题进行了介绍。地理学家通常对佳能保持沉默,但相反,他们对相关概念(例如传统和范式)具有复杂的掌握。有人认为,地理学家不应采用明确的规范概念,但值得进一步关注规范。参与地理规范不是规定性的。相反,它的构建将是一个个人选择,涉及与更广泛的学术团体合作。但是,这样做的目的是创造生产性途径,以考虑识别地理的文本,习惯和做法。结论是,有关规范性的辩论为地理学家对史学和教育学的考虑提供了很多依据。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号