首页> 外文期刊>Journal of High Technology Management Research >Social capital and entrepreneurial growth aspiration: a comparison of technology- and non-technology-based nascent entrepreneurs
【24h】

Social capital and entrepreneurial growth aspiration: a comparison of technology- and non-technology-based nascent entrepreneurs

机译:社会资本与企业家成长愿望:基于技术和非基于技术的新生企业家的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Social capital is broadly described by researchers as an asset embedded in relationships―of individuals, communities, networks or societies [Admin. Sci. Q. 42 (1997) 339; Acad. Manage. Rev. 23 (1998) 242; Organ. Sci. 8 (1997) 109]. This study will build upon Nahapiet and Ghoshal's [Acad. Manage. Rev. 23 (1998) 242] three dimensions of social capital, including the structural, the relational, and the cognitive. The purpose of this research is to investigate (1) how the three dimensions of social capital interact among themselves in technology-intensive new ventures, (2) to what extent the interactions are different from those in the context of non-technology-based new ventures, (3) how the three dimensions of social capital influence the growth aspiration of the technology-based new ventures in a way that is different from non-technology-based ventures. We examined these questions using a data set from Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics (PSED) [Reynolds, P. (2000). National panel study of US business start-ups: background and methodology. In Databases for the study of entrepreneurs hip Vol. 4 (153-227) Greenwich, CT: JAI Press/Elsevier]. Results from structural equation modeling suggest that technology-based entrepreneurs benefit more from relational embeddedness―the freer and greater exchange of non-redundant information. Non-technology-based entrepreneurs benefit more from structural embeddedness―the extensiveness of social networks. Each dimension of social capital reinforces the creation of the other dimensions in technology-based new ventures, which in turn, contributes to entrepreneurial growth aspiration. Our findings suggest that the closure [Am. J. Sociol. 94 (1988) S95] and hole arguments [Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press; Admin. Sci. Q. 42 (1997) 339] are not as contradictory as they might seem. Implications and future research directions are proposed.
机译:研究人员广泛地将社会资本描述为嵌入个人,社区,网络或社会关系中的一种资产。科学Q.42(1997)339;学院管理。 23(1998)242;器官。科学8(1997)109]。这项研究将以Nahapiet和Ghoshal的著作为基础。管理。 Rev. 23(1998)242]社会资本的三个维度,包括结构,关系和认知。这项研究的目的是研究(1)在技术密集型新企业中社会资本的三个维度如何相互影响;(2)与非基于技术的新企业相比,这种相互作用在多大程度上有所不同? (3)社会资本的三个维度如何以不同于非技术型企业的方式影响基于技术的新企业的增长愿望。我们使用来自“企业动力学小组研究”(PSED)[Reynolds,P.(2000)的数据集”研究了这些问题。美国商业初创公司的国家小组研究:背景和方法。在数据库中的企业家髋关节研究卷。 4(153-227),格林威治,CT:JAI Press / Elsevier]。结构方程建模的结果表明,基于技术的企业家从关系嵌入中受益更多—非冗余信息的自由和大量交换。非技术型企业家从结构嵌入(社交网络的广泛性)中受益更多。社会资本的每个维度都加强了基于技术的新企业中其他维度的创建,从而促进了企业家的成长愿望。我们的研究结果表明,关闭[Am。 J. Sociol。 94(1988)S95]和孔论点[Burt,R.S. (1992)。结构孔。马萨诸塞州剑桥市:哈佛商业出版社;管理员。科学[Q. 42(1997)339]并不像看起来那样矛盾。提出了启示和未来的研究方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号