首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health organization and management >Concealing paradoxes in decision-making during hospital hybridization - a systems theoretical analysis
【24h】

Concealing paradoxes in decision-making during hospital hybridization - a systems theoretical analysis

机译:隐藏在医院杂交期间决策中的悖论 - 系统理论分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose While previous health-care-related hybridity research has focused on macro- and micro-level investigations, this paper aims to study hybridization at the organizational level, with a specific focus on decision-making. The authors investigate how new politico-economic expectations toward a university hospital as a hybrid organization become internalized via organizational decision-making, resulting in the establishment of a new business collaboration and innovation-oriented unit. Design/methodology/approach The authors employed a social systems theoretical framework to explore organizational decision-making processes involved in the establishment of the new hybrid hospital unit. Drawing on 15 interviews and nine organizational documents, the authors describe and analyze three decision-making cycles using the concepts of complexity, decision and justification. Findings The findings reveal the challenging nature of decision-making during hybridization, as decisions regarding unprecedented organizational structures and activities cannot be justified by traditional decision premises. The authors show that decision-makers use a combination of novel justification strategies, namely, justification by problems, by examples and by obligations, to legitimize decisions oriented at non-traditional activities. Further, the analysis reveals how expectations of several societal systems, i.e. health care, education, science, law, economy and politics, are considered in decision-making taking place in hybrid organizations. Originality/value The study draws attention to the complexity of decision-making in a hybrid context and highlights the role of justification strategies in partially reducing complexity by concealing the paradoxical nature of decision-making and ensuring the credibility of resulting decisions. Also, the study presents a move beyond the dualism inherent in many previous hybridity studies by illustrating the involvement of several societal systems in hybridization.
机译:目的虽然以前的医疗保健相关的混合研究专注于宏观和微观的调查,但本文旨在研究组织层面的杂交,特别关注决策。作者调查了作为混合组织作为大学医院的新政治经济期望如何通过组织决策内化,从而建立了一个新的业务合作和创新的股份。设计/方法/方法提交人雇用了一个社会系统理论框架,探讨了在建立新的混合医院单元的组织决策过程。作者绘制了15次访谈和九个组织文件,使用复杂性,决策和理由的概念来描述和分析三个决策周期。调查结果表明,杂交期间决策的具有挑战性,因为关于前所未有的组织结构和活动的决定不能通过传统决定场所的理由。作者表明,决策者使用新颖的理由策略的组合,即通过例子和义务的问题,使义务合法化在非传统活动中的决定。此外,分析揭示了若干社会系统的预期如何,即医疗保健,教育,科学,法律,经济和政治,在混合组织进行决策中被视为决策。原创性/价值研究提请注意在混合环境中决策的复杂性,并突出了通过隐藏决策的矛盾性质和确保导致决策的可信度的矛盾性质,突出了正当化策略在部分降低复杂性方面的作用。此外,该研究通过说明若干社会系统在杂交中的累积中,这一项研究表明了超出了许多先前的混合研究中固有的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号