首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Health, Organization and Management >Mind the gap Understanding utilisation of evidence and policy in health care management practice
【24h】

Mind the gap Understanding utilisation of evidence and policy in health care management practice

机译:注意差距了解卫生保健管理实践中证据和政策的利用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The paper aims to take a reflective stance on the relationship between policy/evidence and practice, which, the authors argue, is conceptually under-developed. The paper aims to show that current research perspectives fail to frame evidence and policy in relation to practice. Design/methodology/approach - A qualitative study was conducted in the English NHS in four Primary Care Trusts (PCTs). Seventy-five observations of meetings and 52 semi-structured interviews were completed. The approach to data analysis was to explore and reconstruct narratives of PCT managers' real practices. Findings - The exploratory findings are presented through two kinds of narratives. The first narrative vividly illustrates the significance of the active involvement, skills and creativity of health care practitioners for policy implementation. The second narrative elucidates how problems of collaboration among different experts in PCTs might emerge and affect evidence utilisation in practice. Practical implications - The findings exemplify that policies are made workable in practice and, hence, policy makers may also need to be mindful of practical intricacies and conceive policy implementation as an iterative process. Originality/value - The contribution of this paper lies in offering an alternative and important perspective to the debate of utilisation of policy/evidence in health care management and in advancing existing understanding of health care management practice. The paper's rich empirical examples demonstrate some important dimensions of the complexity of practice.
机译:目的-本文旨在对政策/证据与实践之间的关系采取反思性立场,作者认为这在概念上尚不完善。本文旨在表明,当前的研究视角未能建立与实践相关的证据和政策。设计/方法/方法-在英国NHS中对四个初级保健信托(PCT)进行了定性研究。完成了对会议的75次观察和52次半结构化访谈。数据分析的方法是探索和重建PCT管理者实际做法的叙述。调查结果-探索性调查结果通过两种叙述形式呈现。第一个叙述生动地说明了卫生保健从业者的积极参与,技能和创造力对于政策实施的重要性。第二个叙述阐明了PCT中不同专家之间的协作问题可能如何出现并在实践中影响证据的利用。实际意义-研究结果表明,政策在实践中是可行的,因此,政策制定者可能还需要注意实际的复杂性,并将政策实施视为迭代过程。原创性/价值-本文的贡献在于为在医疗保健管理中利用政策/证据的辩论提供另一种重要观点,并增进对医疗保健管理实践的现有理解。本文丰富的经验示例说明了实践复杂性的一些重要方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号