首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health economics >Do patients choose hospitals with high quality ratings? Empirical evidence from the market for angioplasty in the Netherlands
【24h】

Do patients choose hospitals with high quality ratings? Empirical evidence from the market for angioplasty in the Netherlands

机译:患者会选择质量等级较高的医院吗?来自荷兰血管成形术市场的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A necessary condition for competition to promote quality in hospital markets is that patients are sensitive to differences in hospital quality. In this paper we examine the relationship between hospital quality, as measured by publicly available quality ratings, and patient hospital choice for angioplasty using individual claims data from a large health insurer. We find that Dutch patients have a high propensity to choose hospitals with a good reputation, both overall and for cardiology, and a low readmission rate after treatment for heart failure. Relative to a mean readmission rate of 8.5% we find that a 1%-point lower readmission rate is associated with a 12% increase in hospital demand. Since readmission rates are not adjusted for case-mix they may not provide a correct signal of hospital quality. Insofar patients base their hospital choice on such imperfect quality information, this may result in suboptimal choices and risk selection by hospitals.
机译:竞争以提高医院市场质量的必要条件是患者对医院质量的差异敏感。在本文中,我们使用大型健康保险公司的个人索赔数据,检查了通过公开可用的质量等级衡量的医院质量与患者进行血管成形术的医院选择之间的关系。我们发现,荷兰患者倾向于选择在整体和心脏病方面信誉良好的医院,以及因心力衰竭接受治疗后再入院率较低的医院。相对于8.5%的平均再入院率,我们发现再入院率降低1%点会导致医院需求增加12%。由于未针对病例混合调整再入院率,因此可能无法提供正确的医院质量信号。就此而言,患者基于这样不完善的质量信息来选择医院,这可能会导致医院选择不佳以及风险选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号