...
首页> 外文期刊>Hazmat Packager & Shipper >HAZMAT Packager & Shipper's Exclusive Comments on U.S. DOT Letters of Interpretation of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
【24h】

HAZMAT Packager & Shipper's Exclusive Comments on U.S. DOT Letters of Interpretation of the Hazardous Materials Regulations

机译:HAZMAT包装商和托运人对美国DOT危险材料法规解释书的专有评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

How should one classify a liquid hazardous material that is in a pressure receptacle and charged with a compressed gas (when not in the form of an "aerosol")? This is a classification question that arises with surprising regularity. It is addressed in only the most general of terms in § 173.305 of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR). DOT has addressed the issue in prior interpretations. For example, in one that I recall, DOT opined that a "mixture" (my term) consisting of a toxic liquid charged with a Division 2.2 gas should be classified in Division 2.3. But in none of the prior interpretations do I recall DOT'S rationale being quite so clearly explained as in this most current letter. This letter, therefore, is very helpful in providing general guidance to address this classification issue. It is for this reason that I wish to draw particular attention to it.
机译:如何将位于压力容器中并充有压缩气体的液态有害物质分类(当不是“气溶胶”形式时)?这是一个分类问题,它以令人惊讶的规律性出现。仅在《有害物质法规》(HMR)§173.305中最笼统的术语中解决此问题。 DOT已在先前的解释中解决了该问题。例如,在我记得的一个案例中,DOT认为包含由2.2分区气体充入的有毒液体组成的“混合物”(我​​的用语)应归为2.3分区。但是,在任何先前的解释中,我都没有回想起DOT的基本原理能够像本最新信中那样清晰地解释过。因此,这封信对于提供解决该分类问题的一般指导非常有帮助。出于这个原因,我希望特别注意它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号