...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hazardous Materials >Tracer studies for evaluation of in situ air sparging and in-well aeration system performance at a gasoline-contaminated site
【24h】

Tracer studies for evaluation of in situ air sparging and in-well aeration system performance at a gasoline-contaminated site

机译:示踪剂研究,用于评估汽油污染场所的现场空气喷射和井内曝气系统性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Field-scale tracer studies were conducted at a gasoline-contaminated site in order to evaluate the effectiveness of in situ air sparging (IAS) and in-well aeration (IWA) in controlling the movement of soil gas and groundwater in the subsurface. The field site was comprised of silty sand (SM) and silty clay (CL), underlain by a clay layer at approximately 7.6m. Depth to groundwater ranged from 2.4 to 3 m. Soil permeability and the natural hydraulic gradient were both low. Helium was used to trace the movement of soil gas in the unsaturated zone during the IAS field study, and successfully confirmed short-circuit pathways for injected air and demonstrated the limited distribution of injected gases at this site. Fluorescein, bromide, and rhodamine were used to trace the movement of groundwater during the IWA system field study, and successfully documented the inability of the IWA system to recirculate enough groundwater to enhance subsurface dissolved oxygen levels or to remediate groundwater by air stripping at this site. The inability of the systems to remediate the site was likely due to site conditions which consist of low-permeability soils and decreasing permeability with depth. As a result, relatively impermeable layers exist at the depth of the IAS screen and the lower IWA screen. These site conditions are not conducive to successful performance of either remediation system.
机译:为了评估现场空气喷射(IAS)和井内曝气(IWA)在控制地下土壤气体和地下水运动中的有效性,在汽油污染的地点进行了现场规模的示踪剂研究。现场由粉砂(SM)和粉质粘土(CL)组成,在约7.6m的粘土层下。地下水深度为2.4至3 m。土壤渗透率和天然水力梯度均较低。在IAS野外研究期间,使用氦气追踪了非饱和区土壤气体的运动,并成功地确定了注入空气的短路路径,并证明了该位置注入气体的分布有限。在IWA系统现场研究期间,荧光素,溴化物和若丹明被用于追踪地下水的运动,并成功地证明了IWA系统无法再循环足够的地下水以提高地下溶解氧水平或通过在该地点进行空气汽提来补救地下水。该系统无法修复现场的原因很可能是由于现场条件所致,该条件包括低渗透性土壤和随深度而降低的渗透率。结果,在IAS筛网和下部IWA筛网的深度存在相对不可渗透的层。这些现场条件不利于任何补救系统的成功执行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号