首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hazardous Materials >A comparative study of fungal and bacterial biofiltration treating a VOC mixture
【24h】

A comparative study of fungal and bacterial biofiltration treating a VOC mixture

机译:真菌和细菌生物滤池处理VOC混合物的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Bacterial biofilters usually exhibit a high microbial diversity and robustness, while fungal biofilters have been claimed to better withstand low moisture contents and pH values, and to be more efficient coping with hydrophobic volatile organic compounds (VOCs). However, there are only few systematic evaluations of both biofiltration technologies. The present study compared fungal and bacterial biofiltration for the treatment of a VOC mixture (propanal, methyl isobutyl ketone-MIBK, toluene and hexanol) under the same operating conditions. Overall, fungal biofiltration supported lower elimination capacities than its bacterial counterpart (27.7 ± 8.9 vs 40.2 ± 5.4gC m~-3 reactor h~-1), which exhibited a final pressure drop 60% higher than that of the bacterial biofilter due to mycelial growth. The VOC mineralization ratio was also higher in the bacterial bed (≈63% vs ≈43%). However, the substrate biodegradation preference order was similar for both biofilters (propanal > hexanol >MIBK> toluene) with propanal partially inhibiting the consumption of the rest of the VOCs. Both systems supported an excellent robustness versus 24 h VOC starvation episodes. The implementation of a fungal/bacterial coupled system did not significantly improve the VOC removal performance compared to the individual biofilter performances.
机译:细菌生物滤池通常表现出很高的微生物多样性和坚固性,而真菌生物滤池则被认为具有更好的耐低水分含量和pH值,并且能够更有效地应对疏水性挥发性有机化合物(VOC)。但是,对这两种生物过滤技术只有很少的系统评价。本研究比较了在相同操作条件下真菌和细菌生物滤池对VOC混合物(丙醛,甲基异丁基酮-MIBK,甲苯和己醇)的处理。总体而言,真菌生物滤池比细菌滤池具有更低的清除能力(27.7±8.9 vs 40.2±5.4gC m〜-3反应器h〜-1),由于菌丝体的存在,最终压降比细菌生物滤池的最终压降高60%。增长。细菌床中的VOC矿化率也更高(约63%对约43%)。但是,两种生物滤池的底物生物降解优先顺序相似(丙醛>己醇> MIBK>甲苯),丙醛部分抑制了其余VOC的消耗。与24小时VOC饥饿事件相比,这两种系统均具有出色的鲁棒性。与单个生物滤池性能相比,真菌/细菌耦合系统的实施并未显着提高VOC去除性能。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Hazardous Materials》 |2013年第15期|190-197|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Departamento de Procesos y Tecnologia, Universidad Autdnoma Metropolitana- Cuajimalpa, Artificios 40, Col. Miguel Hidalgo, Delegation Alvaro Obregon, Mexico ,Departamento de Ingenieria Quimica y Tecnologia del Medio Ambiente - Universidad de Vailadolid, Valladolid, Spain;

    Departmento de Procesos e Hidrdulica - Universidad Autonoma Metropolitan - Iztapalapa Mexico D.F. Mexico;

    Departamento de Ingenieria Quimica y Tecnologia del Medio Ambiente - Universidad de Vailadolid, Valladolid, Spain;

    Departamento de Procesos y Tecnologia, Universidad Autdnoma Metropolitana- Cuajimalpa, Artificios 40, Col. Miguel Hidalgo, Delegation Alvaro Obregon, Mexico;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    biofiltration; fungal biofilter; gas treatment; propanal; mibk; hexanol; toluene; volatile organic compounds;

    机译:生物过滤;真菌生物过滤器;气体处理;丙醛;mibk;己醇;甲苯;挥发性有机化合物;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号