首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hazardous Materials >A comparative study of disinfection efficiency and regrowth control of microorganism in secondary wastewater effluent using UV, ozone, and ionizing irradiation process
【24h】

A comparative study of disinfection efficiency and regrowth control of microorganism in secondary wastewater effluent using UV, ozone, and ionizing irradiation process

机译:紫外线,臭氧和电离辐射过程对二次废水中微生物的消毒效率和再生控制的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ionizing radiation technology was suggested as an alternative method to disinfection processes, such as chlorine, UV, and ozone. Although many studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of irradiation technology for microbial disinfection, there has been a lack of information on comparison studies of disinfection techniques and a regrowth of each treatment. In the present study, an ionizing radiation was investigated to inactivate microorganisms and to determine the critical dose to prevent the regrowth. As a result, it was observed that the disinfection efficiency using ionizing radiation was not affected by the seasonal changes of wastewater characteristics, such as temperature and turbidity. In terms of bacterial regrowth after disinfection, the ionizing radiation showed a significant resistance of regrowth, whereas, on-site UV treatment is influenced by the suspended solid, temperature, or precipitation. The electric power consumption was also compared for the economic feasibility of each technique at a given value of disinfection efficiency of 90% (1-log), showing 0.12, 36.80, and 96.53 Wh/(L/day) for ionizing radiation, ozone, and UV, respectively. The ionizing radiation requires two or three orders of magnitude lower power consumption than UV and ozone. Consequently, ionizing radiation can be applied as an effective and economical alternative technique to other conventional disinfection processes. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:建议使用电离辐射技术作为消毒过程的替代方法,例如氯,紫外线和臭氧。尽管许多研究已经证明了辐照技术对微生物消毒的有效性,但是缺乏关于消毒技术的比较研究和每种疗法的再生的信息。在本研究中,对电离辐射进行了研究,以灭活微生物并确定防止再生的临界剂量。结果,观察到使用电离辐射的消毒效率不受废水特性如温度和浊度的季节性变化的影响。就消毒后的细菌再生长而言,电离辐射显示出明显的再生长阻力,而现场紫外线处理受到悬浮固体,温度或沉淀的影响。在给定的消毒效率值为90%(1-log)的情况下,还针对每种技术的经济可行性对电耗进行了比较,表明电离辐射,臭氧,和紫外线。与紫外线和臭氧相比,电离辐射的功耗要低两个或三个数量级。因此,电离辐射可以作为其他常规消毒方法的一种有效且经济的替代技术。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Hazardous Materials》 |2015年第15期|201-208|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Anim & Plant Quarantine Agcy Plant, Quarantine Technol Ctr, Anyang 480757, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea;

    Korea Atom Energy Res Inst, Adv Radiat Technol Inst, Jeongeup 580185, Jeonbuk, South Korea;

    Korea Atom Energy Res Inst, Adv Radiat Technol Inst, Jeongeup 580185, Jeonbuk, South Korea;

    Korea Atom Energy Res Inst, Adv Radiat Technol Inst, Jeongeup 580185, Jeonbuk, South Korea;

    Korea Atom Energy Res Inst, Adv Radiat Technol Inst, Jeongeup 580185, Jeonbuk, South Korea;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Ionizing radiation; UV; Ozone; Disinfection; Bacterial regrowth; Electric energy consumption;

    机译:电离辐射紫外线臭氧消毒细菌再生长电耗;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号