...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics >Command Generation for Flexible Systems by Input Shaping and Command Smoothing
【24h】

Command Generation for Flexible Systems by Input Shaping and Command Smoothing

机译:通过输入整形和命令平滑来生成灵活系统的命令

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Aggressive motions are often discouraged when a system has flexible dynamics. Common practice suggests thatnsmooth commands, such as S-curves, should be used to drive the system. However, smooth commands cannot benimplemented on some actuators, such as the on/off thrusters used on spacecraft or on/off valves used with hydraulicsnand pneumatics. Furthermore, smooth commands can lead to sluggish response. A rigorous comparison of smoothnand nonsmooth reference commands is presented in this paper. The evaluation is performed by treating smoothncommand profiles as input-shaped functions. Input shaping is a method of reducing residual vibration by convolvingna sequence of impulses with a baseline reference command. By interpreting smooth commands as input-shapednfunctions, a common criterion for comparing smooth and nonsmooth commands is developed. The results of thisncomprehensive comparison indicate that input-shaped step functions are usually more efficient for reducingnvibration than commonly used smooth commands. A portable tower crane is used to experimentally verify thencomparison between input-shaped and smooth commands.
机译:当系统具有灵活的动力时,通常不鼓励进行激进的运动。常规做法建议使用nsmooth命令(例如S曲线)来驱动系统。但是,在某些执行器上无法实现平滑命令,例如航天器上使用的开/关推进器或与液压和气动装置一起使用的开/关阀。此外,平滑的命令可能导致响应缓慢。本文对平滑和非平滑参考命令进行了严格的比较。通过将smoothncommand轮廓视为输入形函数来执行评估。输入整形是一种通过将脉冲序列与基线参考命令卷积来减少残留振动的方法。通过将平滑命令解释为输入整形函数,开发了用于比较平滑命令和非平滑命令的通用标准。全面比较的结果表明,输入形阶跃函数通常比常用的平滑命令更有效地减少振动。便携式塔式起重机用于实验验证输入形状命令和平滑命令之间的比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号