...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics >Single Versus Two-Loop Full-State Multi-Input Missile Guidance
【24h】

Single Versus Two-Loop Full-State Multi-Input Missile Guidance

机译:单对两环全状态多输入导弹制导

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Two types of autopilot-guidance schemes for linear quadratic multi-input missile systems are compared: single-and two-loop configurations. In both cases, all the states are fed back into the guidance loop. In the two-loop case, the inner autopilot loop is designed separately from the outer guidance loop, whereas in the single-loop scheme, the guidance command is injected directly to the actuator, without a definite autopilot It is proven that the two schemes achieve the same performance if and only if the number of guidance commands is identical to the number of available controllers. Thus, using the full-state two-loop scheme may be preferred, because it ensures a stabilized airframe whether the guidance loop is active or not The theorem and guidance laws are illustrated using a dual-control missile model.
机译:比较了线性二次多输入导弹系统的两种自动驾驶制导方案:单回路和两回路配置。在这两种情况下,所有状态都反馈到引导循环中。在双回路情况下,内部自动驾驶仪回路与外部引导回路分开设计,而在单回路方案中,引导命令直接注入执行器,而没有确定的自动驾驶仪,这证明了两种方案都可以实现当且仅当引导命令的数量与可用控制器的数量相同时,才具有相同的性能。因此,使用全状态两回路方案可能是优选的,因为无论制导回路是否有效,它都能确保机体稳定。定理和制导律使用双控制导弹模型进行说明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号