...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering >Discussion of 'The State of the Practice in Foundation Engineering on Expansive and Collapsible Soils'
【24h】

Discussion of 'The State of the Practice in Foundation Engineering on Expansive and Collapsible Soils'

机译:讨论“膨胀性和湿陷性土壤基础工程的实践状况”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The authors conclude, in part, that "for every billion dollars wasted due to underdesign there are probably 5 billion dollars, or even more, wasted in overdesign." Probably? In fact, the authors fail to cite even one datum to support their statement, making it nothing more than unsupported speculation. The authors also put forth the following with regard to site characterization: "In addition to advancing the hole to sufficient depth and testing samples at those depths is the need for careful logging of the soil profile. Author Nelson asserts that an important element of careful logging is inspection of continuous core when practical. Granted that taking core during sampling increases the cost of investigation, that cost is minimal when compared to potential cost of damages. It is the responsibility of the engineer to educate the client as to the need to undertake that cost. Author Houston asserts that continuous coring is not practical in a great many cases."
机译:作者得出的部分结论是,“由于设计不足而造成的每十亿美元浪费中,有50亿美元甚至更多的钱被浪费在了过度设计上”。大概?实际上,作者甚至没有引用一个数据来支持他们的说法,这无非是无根据的猜测。作者还就场地特征提出了以下看法:“除了将孔推进到足够的深度并在这些深度测试样品之外,还需要仔细记录土壤剖面。作者尼尔森断言,认真记录的重要因素是在可行的情况下对连续堆芯进行检查。考虑到在采样过程中采取堆芯会增加调查成本,与潜在的损坏成本相比,该成本是最小的。工程师有责任教育客户有关承担以下责任的知识:休斯敦断言,在许多情况下,连续取芯是不实际的。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号