...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering >Influence of Microbe and Enzyme-Induced Treatments on Cemented Sand Shear Response
【24h】

Influence of Microbe and Enzyme-Induced Treatments on Cemented Sand Shear Response

机译:微生物和酶诱导治疗对胶结砂剪应答的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) and enzyme-induced calcium carbonate precipitation (EICP) are both soil improvement techniques that improve the shear response of sands. However, the source of urease to hydrolyze the urea is different between the two techniques, and these differences may result in different shear responses. The macro- and microscale behavior of MICP- and EICP-treated sands are evaluated using triaxial tests and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. To compare the macroscale behavior, triaxial specimens were treated using MICP and EICP techniques to reach a moderate level of cementation, assessed using shear wave velocity. EICP-treated sand needs less calcium carbonate than MICP-treated sand to reach the same shear wave velocity. The specimens were sheared under drained conditions, and shear responses are compared. The obtained results show that a higher shear strength and larger dilative strain were observed for MICP-treated sand compared to EICP-treated sand when treated to the same shear wave velocity; however, more injections were required for the MICP treatment, which resulted in a higher carbonate content. The SEM images revealed that the shape and structure of precipitated CaCO3 is different in these two treatment techniques, which in turn likely influenced the macroscale response. The advantages of each method are also discussed. (c) 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
机译:微生物诱导的碳酸钙沉淀(MICP)和酶诱导的碳酸钙沉淀(EICP)是土壤改善技术,可提高砂的剪切响应。然而,在两种技术之间尿素水解尿素的来源是不同的,并且这些差异可能导致不同的剪切反应。使用三轴试验和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)图像评估MICP和EICP处理砂的宏观和微观行为。为了比较Macroscale行为,使用MICP和EICP技术对三轴标本进行处理,以达到使用剪切波速度评估的中等水平的胶泥水平。 EICP处理的沙子需要比MICP处理的砂土更少的碳酸钙,以达到相同的剪切波速度。在排水条件下剪切标本,并比较剪切响应。得到的结果表明,与在相同的剪切波速度处理时,与EICP处理的砂相比,对MICP处理的砂进行了较高的剪切强度和较大的扩张菌株;然而,MICP处理需要更多的注射,从而导致更高的碳酸酯含量。 SEM图像显示,沉淀的CaCO3的形状和结构在这两种处理技术中是不同的,这反过来可能影响宏观响应。还讨论了每种方法的优点。 (c)2019年美国土木工程学会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号