首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Genocide Research >Reconsidering the slaughter bench of history: genocide, theodicy, and the philosophy of history
【24h】

Reconsidering the slaughter bench of history: genocide, theodicy, and the philosophy of history

机译:重新考虑历史的屠杀台:种族灭绝,神父论和历史哲学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This essay examines the philosophy of history in the aftermath of the twentieth century. It argues that the philosophy of history has been both a catalyst and a victim of genocide. On the one hand, theories about the fated course of human development have been used to rationalize and justify imperialist, genocidal actions, especially insofar as they often placed the peoples and nations on the supposed right or wrong side of an imagined world-historical trajectory. On the other hand, the philosophy of history eventually collapsed under-and was delegitimized by-the weight of the last century's mounting catastrophes. The essay opens by briefly outlining the relationship between theodicy, universal history, and empire in the works of Immanuel Kant, G.W.F. Hegel, and Martin Heidegger before turning to the writings of a number of émigré intellectuals who came to criticize their respective philosophies of history in the wake of the Second World War. Thinkers such as Theodor Adorno, Hannah Arendt, Walter Benjamin, Carl G. Hempel, Karl Löwith, Leo Strauss, and Eric Voegelin either abandoned or sought to rewrite the philosophy of history in light of what they viewed not as progress, but as world-historical calamity. For contemporary intellectuals engaged in debates about the meaning and effects of modernization, globalization, and development, these writings remain necessary points of reference. The essay concludes by suggesting that if the philosophy of history is to be of any help in ongoing attempts to understand and confront contemporary genocide, then we must first reconsider its historical complicity with genocidal ideology.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2011.559115
机译:本文考察了二十世纪后的历史哲学。它认为历史哲学既是种族灭绝的催化剂又是受害者。一方面,关于人类发展注定进程的理论已被用来合理化和证明帝国主义的种族灭绝行动,特别是因为它们经常使人民和民族处于想象中的世界历史轨迹的正确或错误的一面。另一方面,历史哲学最终在上个世纪不断加剧的灾难的重压之下崩溃了,并被贬低了合法性。本文首先简要概述了神父,伊曼纽尔·康德(Immanuel Kant)作品中的神学,普遍历史和帝国之间的关系。黑格尔和马丁·海德格尔(Martin Heidegger),然后转向第二批第二次世界大战后批评他们各自的历史哲学的“移民”知识分子的著作。西奥多·阿多诺(Theodor Adorno),汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt),沃尔特·本杰明(Walter Benjamin),卡尔·G·汉佩尔(Carl G.世界历史的灾难。对于当代关于现代化,全球化和发展的意义和影响的辩论的知识分子来说,这些著作仍然是必要的参考依据。本文的结论是,如果历史哲学对正在进行的理解和面对当代种族灭绝的尝试有任何帮助,那么我们必须首先考虑种​​族灭绝意识形态的历史同谋。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand: “泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2011.559115

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号