首页> 外文期刊>Journal of futures markets >Open outcry versus electronic trading: Tests of market efficiency on crude palm oil futures
【24h】

Open outcry versus electronic trading: Tests of market efficiency on crude palm oil futures

机译:公开喊价与电子交易:原油棕榈油期货的市场效率测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Given the widespread transfer of trading to electronic platforms we ask whether such trading is more efficient than open outcry. Examining the Crude Palm Oil (CPO) market from 1995:06 to 2008:07, our findings, derived from a novel threshold autoregressive relative efficiency measure, are that efficiency is conditional on: (i) volatility; (ii) the maturity of the futures contract; and (iii) the market trading system. Specifically, when volatility is high, open outcry is superior for shorter maturities and electronic trading for longer maturities. These results suggest an efficiency skew and that there may be benefits to the coexistence of trading mechanisms.
机译:考虑到交易已广泛转移到电子平台,我们问这种交易是否比公开喊价更有效。考察1995:06至2008:07的粗棕榈油(CPO)市场,我们的发现源自一种新颖的阈值自回归相对效率度量,该效率取决于以下条件:(i)波动; (ii)期货合约的到期日; (iii)市场交易系统。具体而言,当波动性高时,公开喊价对于较短的到期日而言是优越的,而电子交易对于较长的到期日而言是优越的。这些结果表明效率存在偏差,并且交易机制的共存可能会带来好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号