首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Fusion Energy >Simulation Analysis of Charge-Exchange Losses During Neutral Beam Injection on EAST
【24h】

Simulation Analysis of Charge-Exchange Losses During Neutral Beam Injection on EAST

机译:基于EAST的中性束注入过程中电荷交换损失的模拟分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Neutral beam injection (NBI) is one of the most effective heating methods on modern tokamak. As one of the two main losses during the NBI discharge, the charge-exchange (CX) losses are hard to measure due to their scattering. In this paper, through the simulation analysis with NUBEAM and ONETWO, CX losses have been investigated to obtain a rough evaluation by comparing to the shinethrough losses or the beam power. Firstly, according to the simulation results, the ratio of CX losses to the shinethrough losses varies from 0.28 to 1.87 in the scanning of plasma and NBI parameters. Thus, CX losses should not be ignored in the evaluations of the Low-High power threshold and beam torque in beam-heated discharges. Secondly, when T (e) (0) > 1 keV, CX losses have little relationship with the increasing temperature and can be roughly estimated as 17 % of the beam power or 85 % of the shinethrough losses. Finally, in the high collisional plasma, CX losses and shinethrough losses increase with the injected 80 keV neutral beam power. However, the ratio of them is almost similar. Thus, CX losses can be estimated as about 30 % of the shinethrough losses. On the other hand, scans of injected 4 MW neutral beam energy show that the beam energy has little effect on CX losses, which can be approximately estimated as 5 % of the beam power. Therefore, based on the simulation results, for EAST-NBI-1, when the line-average density , P (NBI) = 2 MW and E (NBI) = 50 keV, the total beam losses (CX losses and shinethrough losses) are about 30 % of the beam power. These conclusions will be valuable for the experimental analysis of beam-heated discharges on EAST.
机译:中性射束注入(NBI)是现代托卡马克上最有效的加热方法之一。作为NBI放电过程中的两个主要损耗之一,电荷交换(CX)损耗由于其散射而难以测量。在本文中,通过使用NUBEAM和ONETWO进行的仿真分析,研究了CX损耗,通过与穿透损耗或光束功率进行比较来获得粗略评估。首先,根据仿真结果,在等离子体和NBI参数扫描中,CX损耗与穿透损耗的比值在0.28至1.87之间变化。因此,在评估束流加热放电中的低-高功率阈值和束流扭矩时,不应忽略CX损耗。其次,当T(e)(0)> 1 keV时,CX损耗与温度升高几乎没有关系,可以大致估计为光束功率的17%或穿透损耗的85%。最后,在高碰撞等离子体中,随着注入的80 keV中性束功率,CX损耗和穿透损耗增加。但是,它们的比例几乎相似。因此,CX损失可估计为穿透损失的约30%。另一方面,对注入的4 MW中性束能量的扫描显示,束能量对CX损耗的影响很小,大约可以估计为束功率的5%。因此,基于仿真结果,对于EAST-NBI-1,当线平均密度P(NBI)= 2 MW且E(NBI)= 50 keV时,总的光束损耗(CX损耗和穿透损耗)为大约是光束功率的30%这些结论对于EAST上束流加热放电的实验分析将是有价值的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Fusion Energy》 |2016年第2期|365-369|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Plasma Phys, Hefei 230031, Anhui, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Plasma Phys, Hefei 230031, Anhui, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Plasma Phys, Hefei 230031, Anhui, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Plasma Phys, Hefei 230031, Anhui, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Neutral beam injection; Charge exchange losses; Shinethrough losses;

    机译:中性束注入;电荷交换损耗;透通损耗;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:40:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号